Why Direct when you can invest in Secondaries?

Why would anyone invest in a Direct PE fund when you can invest in Secondaries? The reason I ask is because I've consistently seen Secondaries outperform Direct funds on an IRR-basis (thx j-curve mitigation). There also seems to be significantly less risk given that a Secondary investor holds insight re the performance of the actual portfolio companies before tossing money into a position.

Do Direct funds outperform these Secondaries on a cash-on-cash basis? That seems to be the only explanation I can think of. I'm really curious to understand if there's any other explanation, or if my assumption is simply not true...

 
Most Helpful

You are correct in that two of the primary benefits of investing in a secondary fund is the j-curve mitigation and the lack of blind pool risk. But your MOIC is always going to be lower in a secondary fund compared to a direct fund, unless you lever your position. Take Fund ABC, a 5 year fund which is currently at 1.35x. You expect the final MOIC to be ~1.8x. If you invest in the secondary at the 5 year mark, you get to ride the fund from 1.35x to 1.8x, compared to the direct investor who goes from 1.0x to 1.8x. Given the pricing levels in the secondary market currently (people are buying high quality positions at 10% - 15% premium to last quarter NAV), it is near impossible to make a decent return without leverage.

 

Another factor is premium flagship funds don’t go on the market much. It’s hard enough to get into a consistently over subscribed flagship fund, why would people put it on the secondaries market on any consistent basis?

 

Typically, due to strategy or regime change at the institutional investor. A good example is the new CEO at Harvard's endowment who essentially reset the entire program.

Robert Clayton Dean: What is happening? Brill: I blew up the building. Robert Clayton Dean: Why? Brill: Because you made a phone call.
 

Tempora nihil est praesentium ut placeat est. Tempora soluta vel eum atque. Neque vero doloremque voluptatum corrupti et fugiat.

Rerum blanditiis corporis dolore voluptas. Minima mollitia eius sequi numquam deleniti excepturi quas in. Labore fugit expedita quia veritatis inventore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”