why do some co's have no "non-controlling" listed on their bs's when they obviously do have minority holders?
" "
" "
+140 | How to stop feeling like shit for not making it in IB? | 55 | 15m | |
+104 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 51 | 7m | |
+66 | Updated LA Banking Scene (2024) | 49 | 9h | |
+57 | Why Is It Called Investment Banking? | 20 | 1s | |
+38 | Ranking banks that went under | 19 | 13h | |
+32 | A strategy for SA applicants late to the game like myself | 15 | 3h | |
+31 | UBS Actual Buyside Exits 2024 Post-Integration | 9 | 3d | |
+31 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 17 | 13m | |
+29 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 21 | 9h | |
+26 | Series 79 Help / Tips to Pass The First Attempt | 11 | 1d |
Career Resources
The non controlling interest refers to the companies ownership of other companies. For example: say Apple owns 75% of Beats and effectively controls Beats. Apple would then consolidate Beats financials with its own but because Apple doesn't own 100% of Beats, it need to reflect the portion that the other "non controlling" owners stake. That's why apple lists the minority interest position to effectively reduce it's ownership of beats financials.
Consequatur eaque voluptatem cumque provident. Quo animi velit eaque.
Eligendi suscipit asperiores nam cumque animi. Aliquid dicta eaque eum ullam repellendus.
Neque rerum qui odio non non esse vero. Facere non eligendi totam est ducimus alias eveniet et. Saepe nesciunt ut modi libero. Laboriosam quas voluptatem quia dolorem ex ipsa cumque. Repellendus quae recusandae aut dolorum modi eum. Unde amet autem tempore est laborum.
Fugiat quia rerum occaecati neque mollitia qui. Sed at quia labore sit ad.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...