Why is Core+ getting more attention?

College student here trying to learn more about the industry.

I'm curious why it seems (to me, correct me if I'm misunderstanding) that there is more attention to Core+ funds/firms in recent years. For example BX's new Core+ fund (BPP) from a couple years back. Can anyone explain? Is this related to investors seeking inflation shields, and if so how? Is this because of COVID overall uncertainty?

I also see those core, non-listed REIT platforms at KKR, BX, Starwood, etc. Why are they getting popular and how exactly do they work and differ from conventional REITs? Can anybody explain please?

Appreciate the help. Thank you.


 

Nobody wants Class C office buildings in the middle of Nebraska bro....

 

Nobody wants Class C office buildings in the middle of Nebraska bro....

I think you would be amazed at what institutional investors want these days lol. Carlyle and Blackstone are grabbing up trailer parks like nobody's business, Blackrock is balls deep in single-family homes, etc.

 
TimesNewMoney

Nobody wants Class C office buildings in the middle of Nebraska bro....

I think you would be amazed at what institutional investors want these days lol. Carlyle and Blackstone are grabbing up trailer parks like nobody's business, Blackrock is balls deep in single-family homes, etc.

Well, trailer parks and single family homes have some enticing aspects to them which Class C office parks in Nebraska don't.  You know... that's the reason Blackrock is investing in them in the first place.

 
Most Helpful

Not sure what you mean by "more attention", more compared to valueadd/opportunistic on an aggregate dollar-invested basis? Are you trying to understand why investors don't want the highest return risk spectrum?

Investors want a good risk-adjusted return. Core plus vehicles/deals offer usually offer that, especially those focused on an asset class with histrorically good returns (ie industrial/multifamily). Sometimes, you do a development/value-add deal that hit mid-high teens IRR but the returns is driven mostly through appreciation (remember, there's 2 things that make up returns - income & appreciation). Lots of times, institutional investors, like state pensions, have certain distribution requirements/hurdles they need to meet, and so the majority of their allocation needs to be producing income. Core plus vehicles offer just that - better appreciation than the core stuff, and steady-eddy income stream.

 

The reason no one has talked about yet: Fees. At one point, blackstone was raising $1 billion per month for their non traded REIT. And that’s all from retail investors who they can charge much higher fees to compare to institutional LPs.

Everyone has a non traded REIT now. It is a fee machine. They always have been fee machines, but they temporarily went away because one of the leaders in the space committed major fraud so it fell off the map.

 

Thanks for the reply! Would love to hear more from you -

If we’re talking about regular commingled funds (not non traded REITs), I thought PE shops make more fee money on the riskier, opportunistic funds? Is that so and if so why?

As for the non traded REIT, why can you charge retail investors higher fees? Is it because they’re less sophisticated/smaller/have less negotiating power? Also, who committed the fraud?

 

You’re correct on the fees front.

If the two funds were equal sizes, the opportunity fund would make more money. But it’s hard to deploy billions of dollars and still hit an 18% IRR.
 

So you can raise billions and billions of core capital, deploy it easier (relatively speaking), and the fund is open-ended so no need to go through a fundraising process every few years. It’s just a machine that keeps raising money and pumping out fees

 

Because core used to return >4.00% so there wasn't a need to really distinguish another layer between core and value-add. Now I hear "core" and think sub 4.0% cap-rate.

 

Quasi sint asperiores qui magnam rem. Et non vitae officiis quaerat nihil. Repellendus officia dolores occaecati ipsum saepe recusandae beatae.

Ratione illum qui sed dolores officiis. Quibusdam dolorum ratione sit fugit excepturi dolor qui a. Sed cupiditate saepe beatae quia dolor omnis. Quisquam et qui quia sed rem optio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”