Most Helpful

tldr; people are dumb

You get paid on dollars of raw PnL at most single manager funds and your payout is structured like a long call option. Markets are efficient and so the performance of your portfolio hedged to the market should take on approximately a random walk. Since you cannot predict the underlying to your call, you just choose more volatile underlyings. Fund managers prefer to increase raw dollar vol because it increases the value of their option. The folks giving you money are generally the failures of the finance industry and aren’t that smart. They don’t seem to care that industrials has lower vol than tech and so you get an identical 2/20 payout either way. (Take a moment to appreciate just how stupid this is. You get 20% of upside returns only REGARDLESS of how random your upside is whether you manage something with 3% vol or 30% vol). This is why there are so few industrials focused funds. 
 

giving these people more credit, people generally all know that tech/consumer have more return dispersion on a unlevered basis than industrials. This means if you are long short, there should ostensibly be more opportunities for alpha in tech/consumer than in industrials. This common view exists because our industry calculates PnL in dollar terms and does not adjust for volatility. Of course, what actually matters is vol, but the gatekeepers of capital are usually too dumb to realize this. I have never tested this but I doubt idiosyncratic return is a lower percentage of vol for industrials than tech/consumer. 

 

Short answer I don’t know - you have a lot of tech funds because many single managers that focus on growth or quality skew toward tech and business services since those sectors tend to be fertile ground for high quality business models and compounders more so than industrials which is heavier on mature, capital intensive cyclicals and such. For a long-biased fund paid on raw PnL, tech-heavy makes sense - especially in the current zeitgeist/regime.

Plenty of single managers do quite a bit of industrials. I think the multimanagers at least in the last couple years have struggled a bit in industrials given the turmoil of tariffs/trade - but I’m not sure about that. You don’t have a lot of consumer, fig or real-estate public equity focused funds either.

If I’m an industrials guy and I’m launching a single manager fund, I don’t think I’d market as an industrials focused fund - it’s not like anyone is clawing for that sweet sweet industrials exposure - so why not leave the door open to doing other sectors as needed. If I’m a tech focused guy in what, in my view, is a tech bubble - maybe I market as such for LPs seeking growth. Also, there’s just more market cap in tech in this market.

Finally, some sectors of industrials are really so cyclically driven that you either are market neutral or basically making macro bets.

So back to short answer - I don’t know why there aren’t many industrial-focused funds, but there’s plenty of work looking at industrials w/in single manager and multi manager funds. I initially did industrials banking because I liked the broad exposure to different business models and wanted to learn how to really model and thing about supply/demand and incremental margins and production dynamic and such. I’m glad I did industrials banking though I’m a generalist now.

 

Exercitationem nostrum consectetur consequatur enim voluptate. Exercitationem qui sequi omnis pariatur nam. Saepe magnam eos qui eligendi sint suscipit itaque.

Dolor perferendis aspernatur error deleniti. Rem inventore debitis ex alias aut animi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”