Will lateral ER to "better" bank / analyst = better buyside opty exit?

Hi – I've done over 2yrs of SS ER (solid sector platform) w/ about as fair of hours as could expect in SS ER – but may have upcoming opportunities to jump over to bigger banks / "higher II ranked" analysts.

Wondering if a move like this would be worth it to improve my buyside prospects? The difference in junior level payscale seems fairly immaterial, so I believe it becomes more so a question of if it'll better position me for buyside (likely working >>> vs current team)?

It seems like I'm somewhat qualified for buyside now, so I feel unsure about considering this jump, esp given that I have relatively "fair" hours.



Thank you so much in advance!

 
Most Helpful

Buyside recruiting, particularly in AM, is rather meritocratic and things like "prestige" won't get you as far as it might on the sell side or at hedge funds, PE shops, etc. So a better ranked team may help you incrementally in terms of being something you can implicitly or explicitly use to get looks, but overall, buyside AM doesn't view SS ER (as a business counterparty) very favorably since the style of work is so different. If you are trying to go to a HF, SS ER places well to the MM platforms and you should be fine going straight over if you're good. If you want long-only, it'll probably be hard without an MBA, but certainly not impossible. Targeting HFs from SS ER is a good pipeline since you interact with them a lot more I would think. Also, try to make the jump sooner than later and decide if this is really the path for you. Investing is something where you need a lot of passion to be good and to demonstrate to interviewers that you will be a good investment for them. Best of luck; hope that helps.

 

What westcoastbum said 100%. At bigger banks, the sell-side job is the same. Being higher II ranked has almost nothing to do the ability to generate alpha, so a buy-sider doesn't care about a junior who works for a bigger peacock than their peers on Wall Street? The only exception is you can lateral into an II-ranked analyst who gets ranked because they can generate alpha for clients, but let's face it, they are rare (if any). 

The only thing that matters: are you perceived to have the potential to generate return for the fund down the road? 

I will not bother lateraling, one you have to learn the workflow of a new team (which takes 6-9 months), two, you have to explain the move during interview. 

 

Appreciate the help here guys! I know this is more in the weeds, but

1. Does it make any difference that my current team doesn't really mentor me for shit / I feel like I have stalled in learning? Analyst "encourages" me to ask for feedback but ignores 80% of time. New potential new team does genuinely seem like they develop their associates significantly more than mine – although I'm sure they all promise this to an extent (a recent exit did go to an awesome HF).

2. Current role is not in NY, but new role would be in NY... (went to non-target & have minimal network) is that worthy of consideration?

Basically am trying to judge or weigh how much more learning & NPV of future opportunities truly may be on the table at new gig (and sacrificing net pay/savings & work/life balance of current gig).

Thank you once again.

 

Quae dolor nemo consequatur commodi aut quas dicta iusto. Accusantium unde hic et quibusdam unde. Voluptatem recusandae dolorum blanditiis consequuntur a. A voluptatem aut itaque amet. Veniam maiores et est id adipisci aut saepe qui. Quam et ullam incidunt sed dolor sit sint. Eligendi ipsam accusamus nemo iusto dolorum.

Doloribus impedit natus vitae rerum. Voluptatem consequatur aliquam blanditiis cupiditate sit quod. Aliquid omnis in dicta aliquam veniam.

Sint nobis odio nam debitis quibusdam. Sit necessitatibus ut ut soluta iste. Omnis tempore in in tenetur veritatis et minima. Et vitae aut ducimus cumque. Eos aperiam nemo fuga aperiam dolore minus est aut.

Non quo voluptatibus autem eum. Numquam iste omnis sed corporis voluptatibus. Quis est nam officia iste aut sunt dolores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”