Yesterday Google announced they'd be investing $1B in San Francisco real estate to create more housing in the area.
I would love to hear your takes on this especially in contrast to the recent legislation passed in NYC.
Thoughts?
| +48 | Being asked to stay behind and train my replacement | 14 | 1d | |
| +32 | Best CRE brokerage firms | 22 | 17h | |
| +30 | What does REPE actually do? | 11 | 11h | |
| +29 | New Comp Database - Google Form (Now with Data Validation) | 15 | 17h | |
| +24 | Thoughts on joining an early-stage REPE fund | 7 | 5d | |
| +22 | Starting University LP Fund | 5 | 7h | |
| +22 | REPE/Development GPA | 15 | 11h | |
| +21 | Public Homebuilders | 7 | 4d | |
| +17 | MSRE/MSRED with no RE experience; Naive to think I’ll land a job afterwards? | 4 | 1d | |
| +17 | What would your strategy be? | 14 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
I read Sundar Pichai's announcement. It's short on details, but Google has a lot of smart people so I assume there must be more to the story than what they've presented so far.
I don't think the $1 billion is a real game-changer on its own. The Bay Area is not short on housing for lack of $1 billion in potential development equity. There are plenty of groups who would be willing to make huge investments there, but the real issue is NIMBYism and the resulting slow, difficult entitlements process.
There was a thread about this announcement on Hacker News, and someone suggested that Google could get the most housing bang for its buck by devoting the whole billion to bribing/lobbying government officials to make development easier. Unfortunately that may be correct.
I agree with you. One caveat is that they actually own a lot of their real estate and are planning to lean on local municipalities and communities to have the land around their campuses upzoned to allow for denser development. Effectively saying Yes, in our backyard.
Yes - I drew the same conclusion. It also makes sense as many Google employees will ultimately move into the 15,000+ homes/units Google has proposed thus reducing traffic (another issue in the Bay Area beyond housing).
I'd think of it as a place to park corporate cash / minimize tax as much as anything else.
I grew up kind of out that way. I have friends that live and work there for a very long time. They said the end game is build high density mid to high end housing for a lot of their employees. We'll see.
Voluptatem repellendus tempore rerum. Rem possimus velit reprehenderit dolor dolorem.
Non voluptatibus quia aut voluptas vel facilis natus. Enim commodi error qui fugiat molestiae. Quia quod aut numquam consequatur. Omnis tenetur consequatur qui harum in ut. Quidem omnis velit voluptatibus dolores et corporis quia corporis. Architecto placeat quaerat sequi et qui non ea.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...