Valuation Analyst vs Underwriting Analyst
Nothing is set in stone, but would like some input on these two possibilities in my near future.
First position: Valuation analyst at altus group/NKF/CBRE type firm. The position supposedly touches on many asset classes such as MF, office, industrial, etc. Overall seems like great experience for someone like myself starting in CRE and I believe would provide some decent exit opps outside of valuation/appraisal.
Second position: Underwriting analyst at Arbor/WD/RCG type firm. Possibly focused on the SBL side of the business, but not sure. Also seems like great experience, but could possibly pigeon hole me to MF lending? I am currently very interested in MF lending and would like to become a producer after a few years an analyst, but where would that leave me after a few years if my interests change?
Very curious to hear yalls input and experiences in these positions. Thanks
Underwriting “might” gives you a path to producer since they work closely with producer
Valuation is the back office of back office, they don’t talk to anyone but themselves
Interesting. I had the impression that underwriting analyst would be an easy transition to production, or at least a production analyst type role. So what are the exit opps for an underwriting analyst in MF lending? Just stay in underwriting?
As far as valuation goes, wouldn't getting some (definitely a lot in this position) reps in with ARGUS be pretty useful and able to transition over to IS/debt analyst roles which would lead to production?
I have great conversations with myself though...
Bump
Consequatur nemo alias inventore porro omnis eius similique. Possimus iusto dolor mollitia est sunt aliquam. Nulla quae quia odit est velit aliquam nobis. Qui odit qui blanditiis dolorem rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...