PE vs credit investors - how do the priorities in thought process differ?

Hi everyone:

I’ve been thinking about this question, and would love to get your perspective - how do the priorities in private equity versus credit investment processes differ? I’d love to know what each side think the other side might be missing, and how to form an integrated view!

Here’s what I came up with:

PE - key priorities in investment thought process:
Margin, growth, exit

Credit - key priorities in investment thought process:
Stability of cash flow, term/structure

Would love to hear your views!

 

Can't talk about the PE side, but currently a distressed / deep value investor.

I would say that the investing approaches are somewhat similar to an extent, although depends on the PE firm and their investing style (some target growth while others are value driven). We look for business with low capex needs, stability in cash flows, and cheap valuation.

We try to find situations where there is a temporary dislocation in the market price of the debt due to some circumstance, either forced selling, temporary accounting issues, heavy temporary investment spending, etc. We stay away from turnaround situations as they are too risky.

I would say one thing that is different versus PE is that distressed investors focus a ton on the legal side of things. We focus on credit agreements/indentures heavily and figure out how we can get screwed by management/sponsor or in a bankruptcy process. A lot of game theory involved.

 
Most Helpful

Private equity funds will focus on both potential upside as well as downside, whereas private credit funds will primarily focus on just the downside. Basically it reflects the risk/reward profile of the 2 asset classes - PE will care about upside as their returns are primarily driven by equity value, whereas the returns on private credit will be capped at their margin/coupon so they care less about upside and are more concerned about how things can go wrong. That's not to say PE don't care about downside - they definitely do given they have the most to lose if things go south(they are at the bottom of the recovery waterfall). On top of my head, I'd say some key area topics in terms of potential upside vs downside diligence are:

Potential Upside diligence: - Outlook for add-on acq. opportunities PE guys on this board can chip in on what addt'l aspects they focus on as an equity investor

Hope this helps

Array
 

Sunt rerum vel error et quo autem. Expedita beatae et assumenda hic tenetur et dolor. Ut cum natus ad ratione. Quis occaecati et accusamus ut nisi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”