Best Response

Are you referring to an LBO model or a DCF? If you're talking about a strict leverage buyout model, you really don't count for inflation at all, and you shouldn't.

If you're talking about a DCF, you can account for it any way you'd like, or no way at all. What I've done, and I've never seen any other way, is to simply calculate your free-cash-flow for each period, excluding the impact of inflation/"time" if you will. Then, once you have your stream of cash flows, apply a discount rate (use WACC if you like), and you're good to go. I've never seen a separate breakout of inflation in a model.

Don't take this method as gospel though -- the bank I worked at did very little modeling compared to those at the bulge brackets.

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

You CAN account for inflation in the discount rate used in a DCF (i.e. add projected inflation to WACC), but that's pretty unusual and I wouldn't advise doing this unless your MD/superiors specifically asked for it.

Tough to predict inflation for forward periods, and including it in your discount rate adds yet another assumption to a valuation technique that is primarily driven by assumptions.

 

Not 100% on this one, so someone correct me if I'm incorrect, but this is how I think about it

Inflation is not calculated when you discount the CF. You're just taking it back to PV, based on the returns expected by debt & equity investors. This number, WACC, can and generally includes a size/risk premium, but it doesn't adjust for inflation. Adding projected inflation (whatever the hell that number is, say 2.5%) will increase the discount rate (decreasing PVs of future CFs), which is sort of what OP is shooting for here. As inflation increases, the value of the dollar decreases, which is why the present value of those future cash flows affected for inflation is lower than the cash flows unaffected for inflation. DCFs generally do not account for inflation going forward.

Again, this is just my take on the question.

 

He's basically saying that when you discount, you should discount the future cash flows more because of inflation

but at that point you won't have 1 discount factor and it gets wayyy too complicated. Plus, transactions are done on nominal terms anyway so why bother with real terms? The risk free rate, etc all these things are nominal values

 

WACC is going to include an equity risk premium for the EQ component commensurate with the returns investors expect on the equity (investors aren't blind to inflation: they think in terms of cash and real returns). The debt component obviously takes into account inflation as the rate that the company could refi all its debt is based on the yield curve (which has inflation expectations baked in). Seems like inflation is implicit to any WACC calculation.

 

ERP is the excess return of stocks over the risk free rate. Shifts in the risk free rate are caused by expected inflation and real economic growth. If country A has a higher inflation compared to country B, than country A has a higher risk free rate and vice versa (ignoring economic growth figures).

Keep in mind that the risk free rate is the rate on treasuries (i.e. government bonds). This rate will increase if inflation increases, because one might expect that the ECB/FED will increase their fed funds rate/refinancing rate (in line with their monetary objectives). The same counts for regular bonds, investors wants to be compensated for higher inflation and therefore will ask higher coupon rates. So indirectly the ERP is adjusted for inflation, because of these movements in the risk free rate.

However, if inflation is relatively high, investors are biased towards the equity markets, because it is not 'profitable' to invest in bonds or to put money in a savings account. This might increase stock returns, but from my point of view the efficient market will correct this effect in which there are no arbitrage opportunities.

 
dagobert_duck:
ERP is the excess return of stocks over the risk free rate. Shifts in the risk free rate are caused by expected inflation and real economic growth. If country A has a higher inflation compared to country B, than country A has a higher risk free rate and vice versa (ignoring economic growth figures).

Keep in mind that the risk free rate is the rate on treasuries (i.e. government bonds). This rate will increase if inflation increases, because one might expect that the ECB/FED will increase their fed funds rate/refinancing rate (in line with their monetary objectives). The same counts for regular bonds, investors wants to be compensated for higher inflation and therefore will ask higher coupon rates. So indirectly the ERP is adjusted for inflation, because of these movements in the risk free rate.

However, if inflation is relatively high, investors are biased towards the equity markets, because it is not 'profitable' to invest in bonds or to put money in a savings account. This might increase stock returns, but from my point of view the efficient market will correct this effect in which there are no arbitrage opportunities.

Beautiful explanation...thanks a lot for this

 

Voluptatum rem qui suscipit tempore qui. Quia ullam voluptates excepturi nisi distinctio. Quos consectetur enim quas doloremque cumque dolor.

Quaerat inventore nemo nisi dolorum unde ducimus repudiandae. Ratione nemo quasi itaque. Ut deserunt voluptas quaerat iure ipsa. Possimus ut consequatur id sit adipisci.

Quis quis repellendus illum reprehenderit. Voluptatem ut inventore enim id. Omnis dolor porro possimus autem ut iste quam. Blanditiis harum eos voluptatibus iste ex.

Ipsa atque temporibus possimus atque. Omnis laboriosam et aspernatur totam soluta sapiente. Officia sed quas magni omnis. Ipsum sint fugiat et omnis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”