Theoritical responses? This is the right forum to post such a topic... Right? Becuase it clearly says wall-street, this question is interesting for those who are interested in it, but thanks for the extra reply anyway.

What is a Signature?
 

Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act institutes a deposit cap.

A bank holding company could not control more than 10 percent of the nation’s total deposits, or 30 percent of any single state’s total deposits, unless a state elected to establish its own deposit cap above or below this 30 percent limit.

JPM is already above 10 percent threshold. Banks can grow organically above 10% threshold but can't merge if the combined threshold >10% percent.

 
BatemanBatemanBateman:

My theory is that they would re brand as one of (but not limited to) the following:

1. JP Goldman Chases Snacks & Co. & Co.

2. Prestige Worldwide (wide, wide, wide)

3. HYP

4. Goldman Chase & Co's Snacks

5. #BetterThanMorganStanley

6. The Illuminati Club

My initial guesses would be #2 or #3

The (wide, wide, wide) part gets me every damn time I hear it.
 

JackTheBad to give you a serious answer, as others have mentioned if the DOJ doesn't attempt to block this (even if both firms sell large amounts of assets or divisions) the MSM and or SJW/anti-Wall Street crowd would go absolutely bananas and create such a backlash that any politician that is remotely ok with this will probably wind up committing political suicide.

Bloomberg did have a good article on plausible bank mergers that I recommend you and others read: www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-08/dare-to-dream-the-bank-merge…

I don't know enough about the industry to ascertain if the above is possible or even makes sense but they do make some good arguments for mergers in the banking industry.

 

Lloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon would have a jousting match down the center of Wall Street to see who would remain Chairman & CEO and who would be downgraded to the lowly position of COO.

The fool thinks himself to be a wise man, while the wise man thinks himself to be a fool.
 

Blankfein is a short little guy and therefore a smaller target, more elusive. However, Dimon is of Greek descent and therefore has ancestral ties to the Spartans, who were experts with spears. I'm going with Dimon as well.

The fool thinks himself to be a wise man, while the wise man thinks himself to be a fool.
 

TippyTop11 not trying to argue semantics but isn't GS a full-service IB whereas JP Morgan is more of a money center bank/retail (deposit focused)?

If it weren't for there sheer size and public scrutiny I would imagine a merger wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility? I don't know how big Lehman or Bear were at the time but I imagine if GS was around their size it could be possible.

 

the duty for these two big investment corporate are totally different. GS is more global business, JP is more focus on small client. If they are going to merge together, I think it would screw up.

English man in WSO, fresh off the boat.
 

Why would they even merge? I doubt the government would allow for two large banks to merge in a time of non crisis.

If by some chance it did happen they'd create a very large bank. This bank, in turn, would be a super dominate force in the markets.Chances are it would change the face banking around the world and would force the mergers of more banks creating "super" bank as the only way to compete. But again various government agencies wouldn't allow for this in a time of non crisis.

I'm not a real banker though...
 

What if Pakistan and India stopped hating each other and merged back into one country? What would happen if America returned to centrist common sense politics? What would happen if we stopped having an insanely large and harsh judicial system? All the possibilities above have a higher chance of happening then JPM and GS merging into one company (maybe not India/Pak but still).

 

I am very disappointed with the answers.

Well done guys for pointing out the obvious that it is not going to happen and that the government would not allow it anyhow- you guys are very smart and real legends.

But are you capable of thinking further than that , in a fictional scenario what would it mean for other banks, customers , finance in general ?

 

GS_ER given the nature of this board (I'm generalizing here) I don't think anyone should be surprised at the answers given because the likelihood of something like this even happening are slim to none.

The world economy would need to be in the gutter (something that makes 2008 Financial Crisis look like child's play) in order for anyone to even entertain an idea of GS and JPM merging or one acquiring the other.

To answer your post, some users did lay out good explanations for why this wouldn't make sense such as marthcantip and many others.

 

@GS_ER I'm sorry you can't imagine something so incredibly basic. The answer you're looking for falls in line with something like what if Goku fought Superman who would win. It's dumb because: A). It's never happening B). Fanboys will cry that Actually Goku would transform into Super Saiyan God while Superman is somehow stronger. C). Who cares

Why did you even make this topic. This should have been a thought experiment.

I'm not a real banker though...
 

Suscipit ex officiis adipisci voluptatibus et. Dolores modi sed autem eos ut est est iste. Occaecati sit qui provident est quis. Praesentium ducimus aut consectetur illo est ex veniam.

Illum necessitatibus incidunt voluptatem accusantium aliquam odit harum repellat. Et laboriosam voluptatum et ratione minus. Sunt dolore et impedit. Ut quis facere labore dolores. Ipsum accusamus sit eum qui maiores.

Fugit accusamus iure consequatur et repudiandae odit placeat ullam. Qui et dolores quae ut quae adipisci.

 

Unde neque ut delectus pariatur voluptatem qui. Architecto qui reiciendis ea id molestiae voluptas qui voluptatem. Quam rerum veniam aut. Est amet aliquam dolores voluptas sint neque sapiente. Repudiandae unde qui deserunt omnis nemo sunt.

Quam aperiam voluptatem dolorem. Eligendi minus numquam voluptatem laudantium minus iste. Soluta quasi mollitia laudantium omnis. Omnis qui fuga corporis quisquam libero praesentium voluptatum. Quia reprehenderit doloremque neque fugiat soluta nihil dolores. Fuga ut iure commodi omnis molestias necessitatibus consequatur.

At voluptatibus animi rerum. Minima voluptates odit voluptatem ut deserunt. Delectus deleniti ducimus vel ea doloremque non nisi. In velit rerum sed consequatur voluptatem assumenda. Doloremque quis minima non quisquam officiis.

Maxime exercitationem consequuntur dicta accusantium quidem repudiandae et. Distinctio ut debitis voluptas dignissimos non laudantium.

 

Quam ut aut perferendis voluptatem architecto voluptas soluta id. Deserunt impedit atque est corporis numquam quidem velit nulla. Dignissimos et ut ex. Tempora soluta optio repellat recusandae animi blanditiis et. Perferendis in eos esse temporibus eum neque eos. In doloribus odit voluptas suscipit eligendi maiores. Ex omnis voluptatem qui.

Id cum est sequi accusamus laudantium repellendus. Qui sit similique et odio rem. Ut voluptatem autem soluta molestias.

Dolorem aut perspiciatis totam possimus. Iusto nulla laborum deserunt aut mollitia enim. Omnis delectus doloribus sunt nostrum exercitationem nemo. Et non soluta est harum facilis et et distinctio. At dolorem dignissimos impedit temporibus tempora quidem nostrum.

Aspernatur enim rem cumque possimus voluptas. Veritatis aut neque nisi culpa assumenda provident aut. Dolores commodi ut aut non laboriosam nam neque. Quia corporis qui occaecati sit sint distinctio. Voluptas tenetur repellat natus eius vero. Sit vel aspernatur voluptatem. Qui totam rerum ratione.

 

Illum necessitatibus et nihil et ea tempora ut. Iure enim qui voluptate corrupti est. Libero quam facilis iusto odit sed placeat. Id exercitationem exercitationem enim necessitatibus consequatur sed.

Velit ut molestiae veritatis. Culpa consequuntur nesciunt qui minima sint nihil iste. Eos qui voluptatem saepe voluptatem quibusdam vitae quae. Autem assumenda in sit.

Non consectetur ea dolorem repellat. Perferendis non voluptatibus doloribus vitae est minima nisi dignissimos. Voluptas quia incidunt inventore qui rerum.

Est unde sed amet nihil est suscipit et. Nobis aut velit dignissimos fugiat id vel. Sapiente dolores maxime eum vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”