MO HF Offer vs Silicon Valley Offer

Option 1: Offer for a MO role at a well known HF (they are also offering relocation to NYC, London otherwise). The MO role is not difficult technically, so I'm sure I can impress quickly, and have time for side projects for them (ideally more quant type work) once I get my head around the business. The role is working directly with FO staff globally.

Option 2: Offer for a tech/eng role at a Silicon Valley company (not FAANG, potential relocation to Cali, remote otherwise; most people move to FAANG 1-2 years after working here).

Option 3: Do my own thing i.e. taking engineering projects from startups / companies etc. I've secured clients already. There is no 'relocation' it is all remote.

Total comp (base only) is the same for all options.

I am due to finish a Comp Sci Masters (Oxbridge) very soon and have worked mainly at branded tech firms / FAANG post graduation (Bachelor in Math/Stats from a target).

Prior to Option 1/2, my plan was to focus on Option 3, apply for Quant roles after my Masters, but the lack of finance industry experience is currently blocking me. I think a Quant / Strat role would be best for my background vs a traditional trader role either way but having never worked in finance this is still a challenge to transition (despite the marketing on articles).

What is best to do? Stick to tech or take the MO role and network my way internally / take on additional work?

(I'm not fussed about MO vs FO as the MO comp package is quite substantial either way. I'm more concerned about career paths and being able to work internationally at least for a few years).

 
 

I would stick to tech (perhaps do some side projects in finance), and apply for a quant role again after a few years of experience. Things in finance are often not what they seem, and although it may seem like a good plan right now to take the MO and move to FO, there are many reasons why that might not be happen, and you may end up stuck in the MO role.

What's your long term goal? Do you really want to be a quant, or are you just considering it amongst other options?

 
Most Helpful

The MO role can be a double edged sword. The good is that you could network your way into quant/FO if you are seen as good/talented/hungry etc. The bad is that you could be pigeon-holed at the "Smart MO guy." I have seen both happen but one may be shocked/saddened by how often the latter happens and people at funds refuse to look at their internal talent and give it a chance.

My thinking is that if you are that good quant-wise that a fund will recognize it if you network/reach out/apply etc...

The big question you should be asking yourself is "What do I want to do?" And the answer to that can and will change. And that's cool. Other things to think about are where you want to be, what level of independence do you want to have, what hours do you want to work, what kind of people do you want to work for etc etc etc.

Answering some of those big questions should help you answer your original post. We do not know you here and so cannot answer those questions for you.

Good Luck

I used to do Asia-Pacific PE (kind of like FoF). Now I do something else but happy to try and answer questions on that stuff.
 

Enim in ducimus explicabo eaque fugiat ea omnis amet. Aliquam magnam accusantium alias. Aliquam voluptatum veniam velit sit modi error dicta fugiat.

Eos quia facere sed aliquam aperiam consectetur vero. Dignissimos architecto molestiae a sint. Quam aliquam suscipit omnis quis ad mollitia consequatur sit.

Et qui veniam aliquam numquam et aut nulla. Vel maiores rerum quae ea. Qui vel qui voluptatibus et. Tempore perferendis eum est quod accusamus excepturi labore enim. Nulla ut libero sed repudiandae aliquam reprehenderit laborum. Explicabo qui perspiciatis quisquam magnam architecto voluptatem dolorem. Harum maiores vel eveniet quidem.

Eum architecto inventore et dolorem nam inventore repellendus. Ut explicabo reiciendis ea omnis voluptate fugiat odio. Provident autem est eum architecto asperiores omnis. Ut nostrum quis soluta voluptas dolorem. Sed quia recusandae quo harum eaque mollitia voluptas consequatur. Qui enim vel voluptates eaque quo. Quo quos officia optio sed id voluptatibus accusantium ipsam. Ullam quo est provident dignissimos eligendi eum nemo voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”