2020 HF Shakeout: Who's Up Who's Down

For those of us who weren't around to play during the financial crisis, this is our first time seeing vol get extreme and liquidity get fked. Making this post and hoping it will become a thread where people will post what they're hearing circulating about different funds' positioning and winners/losers so far. Weeks like we just had cause rumors and gossip to spread like wildfire, so stay sharp and skeptical

I'll start with what I've heard, no particular order. Please correct me if any inaccuracies!

Up

  • Moore – bacon supposedly made discretionary call on covid, playing out well. Up close to 30 points according to story I saw
  • Brevan – up
  • Saba – got long protection on cruises back in january. Great rr. Killing it
  • Brevan – similar situation as moore, not up as much
  • Chenavari – big % return short EUR CDX got attention, but it's on a fund that's a small chunk of their asset base, so...
  • Kirkoswald – RUMOR coffey profiting

Down

  • Bridgewater – came across terminal this AM. Down a massive 20% in Pure Alpha, which is supposed to run a vol half that. Big deal.
  • Bluecrest – no return numbers, but their rv book is facing same issues as other multimanagers
  • Solus – RIP
  • Millennium – RUMOR 'big' loss relative to their risk targets (i.e. down a couple hundo bps at most lol)
  • Pointstate – down ~10 points ytd
  • Natixis H2O – shocking, I know. Down like a third I think

Funds I'm curious about: Capula, Exodus Point, Citadel (chatter about their equities book at start of week), Tepper, Druck

 

Moore – I have zero unique visibility on this, but it reminds me of how Michael Platt started swinging harder after he returned institutional money a little while back (like Bacon just did). Makes complete sense, as your mandate has shed a lot of constraints. Also, old-school macro guys tend to thrive under this kind of vol. The vol sellers in disguise, the FI RV guys, who have gotten a fk ton of inflows recently, have a bad time under this kind of vol. One camp makes money, and the other camp loses, when markets cease to 'mAkE sEnSe.'

Mily – 'Liquid' is always a relative term. Conditions this week were fked in super 'liquid' stuff (one obvious example you can check out is straightforward levered CTD basis trades). This is the kind of thing that is not a problem most of the time. And then it is. C'est la vie. When everyone wants to 'quickly reverse their book,' well, it becomes a problem!

 

Sources: odd news articles i came across in the past 3 days from fairly reliable outlets. Will update as i come across any others Pershing Square: +3% ytd Brevan flagship: +11% ytd LMR: -3% ytd Michael burry: up big ytd (no #s) Glenview: -14% (EDIT: thru end of feb, not ytd)

curious about specific #s from tail risk/short funds: universa, kynikos, etc

 

Re: Renaissance - FWIW this likely refers to their public funds' returns. They are still very strong products but their performance has historically been in line with many other good systematic L/S equity funds, and I think they may actually be run with positive beta. I very strongly doubt that the Medallion fund is down 7% through Feb.

 

March numbers will be much more meaningful than Feb so things now could look a lot different than these numbers

 

Millennium down 2.7% mtd so far in March, down 1.9% ytd

 

I'm sure lots of long O&G distressed funds are having the time of their life.

Any long biased distressed vehicle without a short book or active CDS allo will also be down mid to high single digits if not more

 

That was definitely helpful. I think most of them are paid though. I checked Daedalus and it is free. Impressive performance of the listed funds and I didn't know them until now.

 
Peian-Chen:
Well, you can track hedge fund performance through a) Eurekahedge b)Funds Portal c)HFM Global d) Preqin and see who is down and up. You can also track some top-performing medium sized hedge fund on Daedalus Investment Platform through https://daedalus.investments (although the aim of the platform is to invest)

Thank you. Very helpful. Do you work in the Hedge Fund industry?

 
PM in HF - Macro:
Ah great!

Very interesting that the only fund that is sharpe 2 at above 500mio ish AUM mark is a basis fund ha! I wonder what number they will be reporting for March as that will be informative for many other similar funds.

Thanks Peian, quite impressive indeed. Even February performance is good for most, curious to see what will be the case for March.

 

universa investments (spitznagel's tail risk fund): per one client, up 1,000% in feb, and up "multiples of that" in march

"A client of Universa Investments LP, a $4.1 billion Miami-based risk mitigation specialist, saw money allocated to the firm's tail hedging strategy gain around 1,000% in February and "multiples" of that in March, according to Claude Bovet of Lionscrest Capital. That implies a gain of at least 3,000%; the net return on Lionscrest's total portfolio was not available.

"This has been a great period for us and our clients," Universa chief investment officer Mark Spitznagel said via a spokesman, who declined to comment on performance. Other big winners include Capstone Investment Advisors, whose $7 billion firm runs tail risk strategies for clients that have gained 280% this year through Monday, according to a person familiar with the returns; 36 South Capital Advisors' volatility strategy, which rose 35% over January and February, according to data from Societe Generale; and the $126 million Cambria Tail Risk ETF, which is up about 25% this year through Tuesday.

 

Those numbers can’t be true right.

Up 1,000% = 10 times Up 3,000% = 30 times

Total up 300 times. I think that says they were 4.2 billion so that means they now have 1.2 trillion?

Maybe it’s just 30 times and I believe they bled assets for a while - so might be a lot smaller.

 
Volsmiler1986:
Any news on the Quant funds? Like AHL, squarepoint, systematica, gsa capital, cantab? Have read the article that cubist is apparently down 20 percent, which seems weird for Quant multi strat

Not sure about specific funds, but in general the past few weeks have been a disaster for quants. Momentum factor has been wiped out, and gross down of books has hurt as well.

 

Klarman typically runs a net long portfolio with little direct shorts, not to say he doesn't do it at all but most of the Baupost/cubs run a long-biased book with market hedges to dampen vol

 

when funds that hold substantial cash report returns, it's usually inclusive of the cash drag, correct? so in this case, baupost's "invested" portfolio is actually down ~14%?

 

Not directly in this particular space, but there's rumors of large structured credit players down 20 to 30% MTD, which is probably fairly conservative. Anybody doing high yield in aviation or O&G (already the largest single sector in the high yield market) is going to be down double digits for sure, no matter how well hedged. Finally going to start seeing credit players suffer from their levered carry trades...

Just remember: it's not a lie if you believe it.
 

some others: third point: -13% ytd rentech institutional equities: -24% ytd. also, curious how medallion fared

 

I think it's reasonable to say that anyone who has done particularly well in recent years will have taken a big hit. Conditions changed so rapidly very few funds with real size would have reacted quickly enough.

If you were positioned for an event like this it's likely that your performance was sub-par in recent years. Tail risk funds have been atrocious until now and only a few will be making up for that with significantly stellar returns at this stage.

MMs trading "hedged" positions like basis will have been smoked unless their strategies are much more sophisticated than average.

Trend following might be up, but might be too early to say and the limit down moves / gaps might have limited their profits in size.

 

I agree with you but I wouldn't judge a tail risk fund by it's bad performance when the markets are rallying - that's no different to being disappointed your house insurance costs you money when your house hasn't burnt down. Most investors make a small allocation ~5% and rebalance it, they're OK with their TR allocation getting hammered because if that's the case, the other 95% of their risk is likely killing it. I would be more worried if a tail risk fund made money or lost little during the bull market, I've seen some do this by selling vol or adding beta, and when shit hits the fan they don't perform - and that's when the PMs change their names and foff to a mountain to hide from pissed off pension fund investors who thought they were hedged.

 

That's because:

1/ tail protection is actually really expensive. When you run a risk neutral book the extra 2-3% points to buy protection wipes out a huge chunk of your roc. Also, there is actually persistent vol premia. If (a big if) you survive sudden vol spikes like this your long-term expected return from shorting vol is actually positive

2/ LPs do not like dying by a thousand cuts and reaping a feast once every 10 years. Your investors will have deserted you a long time ago.

 

good point. with that being said, i'm surprised at the lack of managers (excl tail risk) that have profited off of a discretionary play around covid. so far, effectively there's moore (family office) and saba. whereas back in 2008, i believe there was paulson, bridgewater, burry, odey, and a few others that were massively profitable. but then again, i may be jumping the gun - more names may spill out as time passes

Array
 

The difference is that the guys who profited big off the last crash were making a fundamental bet against an overvalued market (housing) whereas this crisis is caused by an unpredictable tail risk (pandemic), and so the tail risk guys are the ones doing well.

 

There are still plenty of macro shops doing well so far this month. Brevan Howard, Rokos, Kirkoswald, Tudor are all doing very well so far this month/year. I imagine the bulk of those gains came as a consequence of central bank policy, short oil and general equity shorts rather than anything COVID-specific (short airlines, long CDS on cruise ships, etc.), but at least they're providing some strong returns amidst the carnage.

Just remember: it's not a lie if you believe it.
 

p72 performance includes cubist - meaning that cubist probably is responsible for the entire drawdown

 

On Shaw + 2S + Rentec public funds: https://www.ft.com/content/101cbb3c-6dbe-11ea-89df-41bea055720b All down overall, Rentec and 2S' Compass fund (trades futures) hit particularly hard.

Like above commenter, heard Voleon down double digits. Their performance hasn't been great in general even before this though.

Since equity statarb got hammered it would be very surprising if PDT isn't hurting. No idea on TGS.

Depends what you consider high-frequency but doing very well in general.

 
  • Citadel was down 5.3% for the month through March 20. Its performance has since improved.
  • The fixed-income heavy ExodusPoint, run by Michael Gelband, had been down 3%, and is now up slightly on the month.
  • Millennium had posted a loss of about 5% through March 20.
  • Point72’s losses were around 4% through March 20. The fund had taken a hit from its quant trading group Cubist, which had lost 22%.
  • Schonfeld Strategic Advisors, which had been down about 11% on the month primarily from its quant trading, said it was looking to raise more money.

  • Dmitry Balyasny’s $6 billion Balyasny Asset Management made money in March through Monday, climbing 1.1% in the month, and 2.2% for the year.

Recent update from bloomberg - would love to hear some more info on rational for seeking additional money right now at the pod shops. I'm sure theres a good reason, just not obvious to me rn. Also intersting to see some of these shops pull up so fast (Exodus going into the green and Schonefeld coming back 4% from -15%).

"one for the money two for the better green 3 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine" - M.F. Doom
 

Update per wsj 3/29: Citadel +4.5% ytd, slightly positive March Millennium +

 

It's highly non-obvious that Medallion's performance is driven by what we'd consider "HFT". They are probably doing some HFT-ish things - the lawsuit with those guys who tried to go to Millennium had some talk about IDing and front-running flows in dark pools, for ex - but at 10 billion dollars I can't imagine they don't also have a sizable amount of risk in medium-horizon (hours or extraday) strategies.

The WSJ article has a little more detail and says at one point in March they were slightly down YTD. Which is not inconsistent with having exposure to an equity stat arb factor, say.

 

Iusto recusandae voluptatum veniam sint tempora incidunt. Consectetur est odit ea veniam. Sed nobis officiis quia debitis atque molestiae.

Architecto molestiae quam minima est tempora culpa odit sunt. Perspiciatis delectus quaerat quo numquam architecto possimus corporis. Maiores maxime sapiente fugit quo sed quam et. Blanditiis enim ut id iusto mollitia. Minus voluptatem perferendis nihil velit.

Beatae autem adipisci molestiae itaque quisquam nobis odio. Sed iure sit aut. Est ut possimus debitis deleniti dolores. Perspiciatis minima rem distinctio nostrum vel et molestiae aut.

 

Molestiae saepe architecto reiciendis consequuntur non recusandae. Aut quidem aliquam molestiae eligendi qui rerum iusto. Magni temporibus et nihil consectetur tenetur impedit. Ea sunt impedit minima voluptas impedit magni eius.

Accusamus aut ut ut ipsum sed aliquid. Placeat rem et perspiciatis nesciunt quo omnis. Vitae optio modi tenetur aliquid. Voluptas non occaecati autem ex sed. Quidem quia aspernatur nisi sequi adipisci.

Consequatur a nobis corporis voluptatibus molestias. Alias at tenetur qui saepe beatae aperiam iste. Sed sint ratione debitis dolore.

 

Sunt sunt magnam et. Et qui velit et unde voluptate beatae ut. Vero sint qui provident eum commodi tempora. Quis autem quam omnis quaerat laborum rem.

Explicabo consequatur dolorem dicta. Voluptas dolorum eius aliquid fugit aut.

Et nesciunt nisi harum. Deserunt cumque non dolor voluptatem architecto vero vitae sapiente. Maiores nulla est non illum beatae fuga voluptate. Aut quia soluta omnis saepe odio. Harum cupiditate magnam omnis blanditiis. Doloribus expedita molestias error dolore.

 

Sint ullam quos qui totam quia. Aspernatur dolorem nemo quasi nam unde animi aliquid. Animi excepturi et dicta neque voluptas natus.

Pariatur ea ut ad exercitationem consequatur qui qui et. Velit ut quasi voluptas aut et. Optio officiis vero ut vel.

Molestiae pariatur optio nihil cupiditate consequatur maiores doloribus aliquam. Quaerat commodi pariatur nesciunt provident voluptatem facilis error. Tenetur sequi temporibus laudantium voluptas architecto voluptatem. Consequatur pariatur nam numquam at facere laudantium tempore. Ab laborum aliquam vel molestiae sed qui enim doloribus. Est ducimus vel hic labore in.

 

Facere perferendis iste unde et provident officia magnam. Minus placeat cum hic dolor. Quaerat rerum iste in eum eligendi nam. Earum consequuntur in dolor delectus id placeat a. Dicta cumque voluptatem rerum optio.

Voluptates voluptatibus a sed delectus sint minima sint. Laboriosam nobis cum dolor ad asperiores. Ipsam cumque rerum veritatis officiis quos. Fugit consequatur beatae consequatur ducimus ullam.

Et ad et consequatur nulla repudiandae earum rerum. Repellat aperiam quae quis laudantium cum architecto. In est impedit minus ut deleniti. Ut pariatur doloremque aut nostrum. Et ut numquam ea libero sint quia.

 

Impedit libero ut suscipit cupiditate dolores. Voluptatibus aspernatur nam quas adipisci ut ut veniam. Veritatis voluptatem esse at asperiores quo et.

Rerum ut accusantium facere asperiores rem. Nulla minus qui quod nulla porro. Quia omnis illo recusandae nihil officia tenetur voluptatem.

Saepe soluta rerum et nisi hic ratione iure. Ut iure nemo voluptas nesciunt dolore quibusdam non. Sit magni non provident quia nihil delectus. Aspernatur modi odit ut et. Suscipit eum iusto et itaque voluptatem quos est. Omnis nulla perspiciatis nemo porro aut distinctio. Distinctio adipisci eum perferendis nemo incidunt qui id.

Dolorem non ea labore qui molestiae laudantium. Cum numquam similique et dolorem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”