Moody's Downgrades Banks
As was long foreshadowed, Moody’s rating service has cut the ratings of just about every large U.S. banking firm last Thursday. Although the banks opened lower to start off the week, the share prices were relatively stable during the days of the Moody’s announcement. Primarily because the ratings cut have been priced in as it was public knowledge for some time now that Moody’s was going to go through with a downgrade.
What issues does a rate cut present? Well, it primarily affects institutional investors; most pension funds, endowments, etc. require that their capital is allocated to bonds and equity of investment grade entities. However, when a downgrade of this magnitude occurs, the pensions and endowments are no longer able to hold assets that are not investment grade due to the legal requirements of the funds and are forced to sell any of their holdings that do not meet the criteria.
The problem for the banks is that after a downgrade their cost of capital goes up, so it costs more money to run day to day operations, therefore, firms have to tighten up their policies on how to deploy their capital as it becomes more scarce. Another factor is that banks will have to post higher collateral when entering into new contracts.
Moody’s is saying that these downgrades are primarily based on capital requirements and the results of stress testing the banks for potential systemic shocks. However, if you think about it, most banks that have been working over the last few years to become compliant with the tiered Basel liquidity standards are now for the most part much better capitalized than they were before 2008 when their ratings were high. Part of me thinks that this is an aggressive move by Moody’s to ensure that they don’t get burned like they did by the AAA rated sub-prime mortgage CDOs back in 2007 more than any structural fault that they see in the banks.
Finally Business Week reports that Moody’ is planning to cut the ratings on several Spanish banks, for the second time in less than six weeks. There is a ton of chatter on the various finance forums and media outlets regarding these downgrades and many experts have different consequences that are a result of bank downgrades. Do you all think that the downgrades are a bunch of fluff? Or are there other negative issues that they will possibly cause other than what I have mentioned?
Primary Sources:
Reuters
Business Week
Ctrl+P
were you trying to print this?
nvm
good, they are finally doing their job
One for the finance boffins - JP Morgan holds more debt than MS, but they were able to "hide" their debt by transferring it to another legal entity (their commercial banking division). Everyone knows this happened, knows they have more exposure than MS, yet they weren't downgraded.
This seems like fraud to me, like a scam to fool the markets. Can anyone comment on whether this apparently selective downgrade makes any sense from a financial perspective?
I don't think you or most people on street have read the press release. JPM has a retail funding base that despite the higher leverage provides significantly more cushion. In stupid words, yes JPM may have more debt but has more assets earnings to cushion hence a lower leverage ratio than MS. MS has no retail base but relies primarily on wholesale funding ie short term paper, bonds, discount window etc. It is already clear from the prior crises that when shit hits the fan these markets dry up and serve an unreliable source of liquidity. The fact is that all banks are insolvent as those even with a retail base continue to rely strongly on back stop funding from central banks and it is a model that can not continue indefinitely.
I feel the line "I don't think you or most people on street have read the press release" was unecessary and smug, but thanks for the explanation.
+1. No worries.
Don't forget about the effect of the downgrades on the roughly $64 billion in LOC/SPA-backed municipal securities... mostly held by money market funds, etc... I'm not sure if that number includes TOBs as well... anyway, it's not just the investors in the bank's direct securities that were affected...
Moody's downgrades SocGen and Credit Agricole (Originally Posted: 09/14/2011)
Ummm, not too sure about this. BNP spared though?
about time
Bank downgrades (Originally Posted: 11/29/2011)
Whoa.
A to A-: Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. A+ to A: Barclays and J.P. Morgan. AA- to A+: Wells Fargo, BNY Mellon and HSBC.
With the compliments of our trusted S&P, get ready to post your collateral boys
You guys should come to Oz. Our banks are have the highest credit ratings and highest ROEs in the world. Australia just got upgraded as well to AAA by Fitch, so we are now AAA for all ratings agencies. May the good times roll on!
As long as Bernanke keeps printing money, Australia will do good.
Three Major Banks Prepare for Possible Credit Downgrades (Originally Posted: 03/30/2012)
This ones an interesting one as a similar downgrade happened last year.
Questions: 1. JPM seems to be quite strong compared to all of the other investment banks. Why? 2. Do you think these downgrades will happen? To all three investment banks above?
Check Out This Article Here
J.P. Morgan had a "fortress balance sheet" going into the 2008 crisis, so they handled it extremely well compared to their peers. They were able to buy Bear Stearns, which greatly expanded their IB presence. JPM also benefits by having diversified lines of business (instead of just being a pure-play investment bank like Goldman Sachs). I believe that JPM and BarCap were the only BB banks to post a RoE of over 10% last year.
JPM and WFC are probably the best banks to invest in right now.
Do you think the whole Commercial Banking + Investment Banking combo is better in the long term?
Bank Downgrades Today - Would You Trust Them? (Originally Posted: 06/21/2012)
Since the financial crisis, the inherent flaws of ratings agency have become much more apparent. Downgrades are dangerous self-fulling prophecies in my opinion. As many as 17 banks and securities lender that are exposed to the European debt crisis may be downgraded today by Moody's.
Thoughts? How much does this affect the sentiment on Wall Street? And how much credibility do you give ratings institutions?
Huh, RBC. Canadian banks are usually quite robust..
Really, any bank that has international exposure to Europe is at risk for a downgrade including RBC.
RBC is rated the highest out of all the banks in that list at Aa1/P1. However, they are one of the banks that could be downgraded by 2 notches to Aa3.
I think the worst outcome would be for MS, with a potential 3 notch downgrade from their A2 rating to a Baa2.
Who gives a shit what these rating agencies think right now anyway?
Dammit! The markets are going to be ridiculously volatile.
I am tired of the pseudo-monopoly that these ratings agencies enjoy. How can they have any real credibility after failing to protect their investors from many of the toxic MBSs and their associated structured products leading up to the crisis? Are these not the same people who seem to think that the US is not a AAA country while the bond markets emphatically cry otherwise (what's the latest yield on the 10-year treasury?).
I think I said this before on another WSO post, but why not remove power of determining capital quality from ratings agencies and just let market forces determine what is Tier 1,2,3,etc. For example, bank regulators would say that certain institutions most hold a pre-determined percentage of Tier 1 capital and then they define Tier 1 as those with yields that trade within a certain band (i.e. the corresponding LIBOR plus a certain amount).
Yes.
From my viewpoint, our competition are taking themselves out of the equation. Competition is all fine and well, but being just good while others are sucking....well, that's a cool deal, I'll take it.
They'll bounce back though, I think they're framing these assessments in terms of the generally depressed economic climate, so as soon as things pick up the ratings will climb.
It takes four months for them to figure out when/how to downgrade a bank?
Ratings agencies are worthless.
FML just bought JPM thinsmorning @ $36.43.
Who cares about ratings anymore...
Markets might actually pay attentio to Morgan Stanley today.
Deserunt fugiat quibusdam et porro dolor consequuntur sapiente. Ipsa ut atque harum dignissimos modi id. Voluptas atque ipsa et voluptas necessitatibus autem aut. In facilis recusandae sint voluptas. Quia rerum a sint rem a quae et rem.
Nostrum nostrum repudiandae voluptatem illo voluptatem et ut. Dolorem nulla enim dolore dolores voluptas repellat. Nisi quidem consequuntur consequatur voluptatem quos. Totam reiciendis vitae ut vitae in. Occaecati fugiat nostrum distinctio sunt non nihil atque et.
Placeat et ut sed. Ducimus exercitationem eos maiores iste et praesentium ut aperiam. Nulla expedita voluptates repellat consequatur magnam nostrum rem sunt. Quisquam at quisquam nihil soluta accusantium ducimus exercitationem. Dolorem laudantium vel asperiores distinctio ea. Ut nulla adipisci quisquam qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Dolorum incidunt aliquam deserunt velit ad. Et odio facere enim veniam odio eaque. Ut dolorum dolorem veritatis sit consectetur. In sunt eum quisquam est.
Nulla nostrum distinctio et eligendi fuga culpa. Id ducimus enim dolor doloribus. Autem et blanditiis et possimus aut.
Architecto ad numquam neque rerum et at molestiae. Sit deleniti nobis deserunt fugit. Illum iste placeat quo non quibusdam est. Quae quasi magnam quod corporis.
Dolorem rem qui rem itaque fugit autem ea velit. Aliquid incidunt dolorem occaecati iure optio. Et quas libero a aut ipsum et necessitatibus. Natus dolorem libero odit vero aliquid quasi vitae. Corporis dolores accusantium dolores quos iure dolor eaque. Et consequatur voluptate maxime necessitatibus ipsum ad beatae ratione.