My hedge fund has this practice, is it normal?

I just joined a hedge fund and we have this investment challenge game within our team. The game is to play a virtual investment game with hypothetical money. But the payoff, which is determined by our over/under-performance against a particular index (say MSCI APAC ex Japan), instead of the actual returns of our holdings, is real. So for example if my virtual holdings for the month returned 5% while the index returned 3%, I would receive 2% x USD 100 = USD 200 from my boss. I am just wondering if this is a normal or legitimate practice within a fund house. My boss said he got the idea from a retired Goldman Sachs fund manager who used to do this with his team. Thank you.

 
zeropower:
Never heard of something like this, but if it's risk-free money (i.e even if you under-perform, you don't have to pay your boss), then why complain? I'd go balls deep in OTM options and hope for a major (extra) payday.

no...the exact opposite is true if I under-perform the index, i.e. I have to pay my boss the difference...

my boss said that the GS fund manager team lost almost 2 months worth of salary in the first few weeks of the game, not sure if it's true or not but probably tells you why analysts are not usually good at investing IMO...

 
STIBOR:
Doesn't really sound like that big of a deal. So I don't think it's "normal", but it's also not exceptionally weird.

It's similar to the European quant team at SAC getting together and doing PF Chang's every Saturday night - is that "normal"? No. It's also not really weird. Or a big deal. Or that interesting. Kind of a like this.

Wow. PF Chang's every Saturday? I wouldn't last 3 weeks...

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 
BlackHat:
Not weird, but also kind of retarded since you should probably be pushing any good money-making ideas into the fund...

^^^ this ^^^

Seems like the game is a waste of "intellectual" resources. Instead of looking for safe ideas for the fund 24/7/365 (that's why we get paid 2/20 or 1.5/15), analysts have incentive of spending some of their time looking for riskier (but more profitable) ideas for their virtual portfolios.

 
GBB_19NHS:
damn every saturday pf changs, so you can never do something on saturday but go eat pf changs?

that just sucks

Seriously...just pull my fingernails off with pliers instead and get it over with.
 
SirTradesaLot:
GBB_19NHS:
damn every saturday pf changs, so you can never do something on saturday but go eat pf changs?

that just sucks

Seriously...just pull my fingernails off with pliers instead and get it over with.

You mean you don't enjoy over-priced faux chinese food in a completely Americanized environment?

[quote=patternfinder]Of course, I would just buy in scales. [/quote] See my WSO Blog | my AMA
 

This is just a more practical, less macho form of liar's poker. I guess you could say this is your office's "liar's poker."

"They are all former investment bankers that were laid off in the economic collapse that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have no marketable skills, but by God they work hard."
 

Similar. I had a setup with a paper portfolio, bonus was based off performance of work & other 50% off performance of paper portfolio. this was to prevent a quite often complaint at HFs that the PMs didn't listen to analyst investment pitches and were the reason for a fund suffering/stifling progression etc.

 

I had heard that a top quant fund (think: D.E Shaw, World Quant, Two Sigma, AQR) would day-trade via a virtual simulator on a discretionary basis during the lunch hours/ down time and see who generates the most profit over the period. It seemed to be a game, and I'm certain that their monopoly money daytrading performance had no bearing on comp.

 

Deserunt sit magnam sint incidunt nostrum accusantium. Sint aut expedita suscipit explicabo. Dignissimos provident soluta inventore consequatur eos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”