BC123:

Megafunds: KKR, Apollo, BX

Non-megafunds: Berkshire Partners, Oaktree

Agreed. KKR is probably the most prestigious for people who aren't in the industry. Otherwise, Apollo is probably the most respected by other PE firms.

Haha TPG? Watch them miss their fundraising target this cycle. As for Bain, their "operations" focus really hasn't given them any edge in recent years.

I might add centerbridge to the list.

 
BC123:

Megafunds: KKR, Apollo, BX

Non-megafunds: Berkshire Partners, Oaktree

Remind me, what constitutes a mega fund these days....>$80bn AUM? Would hate to embarrass myself at the next WSO circle jerk.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Surprised to see so many people put TPG on their top list and leave Carlyle out...

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

And the fact they have "a bunch of non targets..." means?

"We're not lawyers, we're investment bankers. We just call you for the paperwork. We didn't go to Harvard, we went to Wharton, and we saw you coming a mile away." - Suits
 
ibplanet:

TPG hires a bunch of really smart guys. Carlyle has a bunch of non targets thrown in there.

Carlyle hires some pretty damn smart non-targets and makes some great investment choices. Not sure why the presence of non-target individuals discredits a firm.

Or were we talking about Preftige instead?

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

If you want to talk about performance...Apollo's funds blows all of the other megafunds out of the water. Plus they pay like $100k more than other megafunds at the associate level.

Also, Carlyle partners V returned like 11%...better than TPG's 6% but nothing to pat yourself on the back about

 
bugattiveyron:

If you want to talk about performance...Apollo's funds blows all of the other megafunds out of the water. Plus they pay like $100k more than other megafunds at the associate level.

Also, Carlyle partners V returned like 11%...better than TPG's 6% but nothing to pat yourself on the back about

Tough to compare because the vintages don't perfectly match, but for boom-era vintage funds , per Calpers its Carlyle 13.6% ('05) or 9.4% ('07) Apollo 7.9% ('06) KKR 5.6% ('06) Blackstone 2.7% ('06) TPG -2.6% ('06)

TPG's '08 fund's not doing much better, despite being raised in what will probably end up being the best performing PE vintage of the past decade

 
frank_reynolds:
bugattiveyron:

If you want to talk about performance...Apollo's funds blows all of the other megafunds out of the water. Plus they pay like $100k more than other megafunds at the associate level.

Also, Carlyle partners V returned like 11%...better than TPG's 6% but nothing to pat yourself on the back about

Tough to compare because the vintages don't perfectly match, but for boom-era vintage funds , per Calpers its
Carlyle 13.6% ('05) or 9.4% ('07)
Apollo 7.9% ('06)
KKR 5.6% ('06)
Blackstone 2.7% ('06)
TPG -2.6% ('06)

TPG's '08 fund's not doing much better, despite being raised in what will probably end up being the best performing PE vintage of the past decade

Not sure why you chose to only looked at '06 vintages for the other players but...

Apollo 22% ('08) TPG 7% ('08) Bain Cap 11% ('04) KKR 16% ('03) TPG 15% ('03)

Also, you said Carlyle's RECENT fund performance blows TPG's out of the water...but 9.4% on an '07 vintage was average at best.

 
bugattiveyron:
Also, you said Carlyle's RECENT fund performance blows TPG's out of the water...but 9.4% on an '07 vintage was average at best.

Yes, both points can be true at the same time. Not arguing with you there. Carlyle's recent returns have been average at best, and yet they blow TPG's out of the water.

 
09grad:

Continuing to take this thread in a more educated direction, can people comment on where they are getting their fund performance numbers from? Not that i doubt you...just would like to look for myself too.

calpers is a good place to start for most of the megafunds. If you have access to preqin that will have a more comprehensive database.

http://www.calpers.ca.gov/index.jsp?bc=/investments/assets/equities/pe/…

 

When pension fund managers get together to chat with each other about who the best funds are, they are usually saying stuff like "nah, those guys are too fratty ... but then again those guys hire a lot of non-targets, so it's a tough call."

 
peinvestor2012:
parvenu:

I'm a bit biased but I think it's between Apollo, BX, and KKR

I throw in Carlyle and GSCP

Work at a bank, get paid like a banker.
I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Not the poster but would agree. Pretty incredible returns across funds (consistently top quartile regardless of fund size). Can’t confirm but heard someone say they’ve never once lost money on an investment. Just look at the people they hire, it’s definitely a fund that’s attracting the best and brightest 

 

As someone in industry, definitely KKR, BX, APO. TPG / CG have so many internal problems that few people who are in industry try to lateral there. Would argue within industry that TPG is less respected than most privately held large cap funds, and Carlyle is headed in that direction too. Many of my friends have left TPG / CG to other PE funds (to actually make carry dollars), but my friends who have left KKR / BX go to public equities, rarely to other funds.

Carlyle just laid off their CEO for contentious reasons, many of the partners left (including their only partner in Menlo), and their funds are performing terribly. One of my friends in consumer told me they might completely stop investing in consumer because of how poorly that team has performed. Tech is undifferentiated and they will never be as good at tech as TB / Vista / SLP. Their bread and butter is and always will be A&D. They've been so focused on credit and non-PE assets that they've lost their edge.

TPG has had terrible fundraising because of subpar performance and instead of performing, they launch every ESG fund you can think of to save their relationships with LPs. Everyone is leaving the consumer / IDMC team to private large cap funds that have better fundraising / performance (ie Advent). Burning franchise that hasn't raised a fund as large as it had pre-GFC...even after 15 years.

 

As someone in industry, definitely KKR, BX, APO. TPG / CG have so many internal problems that few people who are in industry try to lateral there. Would argue within industry that TPG is less respected than most privately held large cap funds, and Carlyle is headed in that direction too. Many of my friends have left TPG / CG to other PE funds (to actually make carry dollars), but my friends who have left KKR / BX go to public equities, rarely to other funds.

Carlyle just laid off their CEO for contentious reasons, many of the partners left (including their only partner in Menlo), and their funds are performing terribly. One of my friends in consumer told me they might completely stop investing in consumer because of how poorly that team has performed. Tech is undifferentiated and they will never be as good at tech as TB / Vista / SLP. Their bread and butter is and always will be A&D. They've been so focused on credit and non-PE assets that they've lost their edge.

TPG has had terrible fundraising because of subpar performance and instead of performing, they launch every ESG fund you can think of to save their relationships with LPs. Everyone is leaving the consumer / IDMC team to private large cap funds that have better fundraising / performance (ie Advent). Burning franchise that hasn't raised a fund as large as it had pre-GFC...even after 15 years.

All excellent points. Would just flag that in PE and to those who care less about undergrads thinking about whether they’re cool (and in particular those who are VP+) Advent, Apollo, H&F, CD&R would be my choice for best funds. Given their history of top tier returns and consistency.  

 

1. Solidified 'institutional' asset managers that are clearly real businesses and have built / continue to build real competitive moats (e.g., diversified funds, fee-driven earnings, backward integration to lock in owned-capital) - most likely to still be operating 50 years from now:

  • BX, KKR, Apollo 
  • Carlyle - basically worse-run, sub-scale version of the above - probably won't disappear anytime soon, but certainly gap between Carlyle and the rest is increasing

2. Strong private equity / investment funds that are very good at their specialty area and have some sort of fly-wheel building (in this case, buyout PE)

  • Advent, H&F
  • Bain - although based more on historical track record than anything else

3. Funds that are basically 1-2 bad funds from disappearing.

  • Everyone else 

Edit: So this is a bit provocative but really think about it - private equity are just like any other business in that it's highly competitive and over time as with any industry, there are very few long-term sustainable winners. What makes PE really hard is that the results are 100% measurable - and at the end of the day, there is virtually nothing proprietary about any of it - it's just people - and people leave, retire, die. Companies like Google, J&J, Costco, Walmart, Coca Cola, McDonalds will far outlive the vast majority of PE funds

 

Just for Bain isn't performance pretty subpar for their latest flagship vintage? 

 
Funniest

Arguably the dumbest post ive ever seen on this site and that’s saying something, get an offer first. It’s a tough industry and be happy if you can break in at all. over long term risk adjusted comp will be around the same given going to a top firm does not give you a 50%+ chance of promotion to VP when the comp begins to matter anyway

 

Assumenda velit aut voluptatum mollitia natus est voluptate. Optio ea reiciendis voluptate laborum sunt maiores. Ipsum vel tempore modi voluptatem cum. Tempore omnis et neque neque illo rerum hic.

Vel est consequatur consequatur aut sed itaque sit. Suscipit quas vel quaerat et adipisci soluta. Ipsum quam fugiat aut illum.

 

Magnam commodi veritatis odit quia voluptas velit commodi sit. Vel soluta est iste magnam et dolor. Dolores laboriosam non at voluptatem aut sequi itaque. Sequi iure veritatis rerum dolorem labore ut dolorum. Placeat enim voluptates ea et fugiat maxime eos sunt. Molestias expedita et nesciunt et.

Quo et ipsum veritatis voluptatem. Pariatur et illo officia et dolorem facere. Autem est sunt aut dolor veritatis dolores. Aspernatur neque blanditiis earum porro et. Commodi qui voluptas voluptate illo et molestias iure. Et doloremque aliquid placeat error aut.

 

Repudiandae autem praesentium modi. Repellendus cum doloribus perspiciatis quae id illo. Vel et eum illo cum qui voluptatem aliquid et. Explicabo facilis praesentium iusto impedit aut est. Qui nihil repellat sint ut sit fugiat aliquid. Sit quod labore ducimus amet sed in.

Perspiciatis voluptas fugiat dolorem reprehenderit vel. Iusto quaerat et quo doloremque. Laudantium voluptatum dolore qui soluta. Autem eum qui cumque et ex architecto quisquam illo.

Dolores autem atque dolorem ut officia dolorem. Dicta quaerat quia autem asperiores. Animi accusamus consequatur veritatis repellat eum repellendus et. Expedita autem non mollitia vero ut dolorem tempore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (21) $586
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (89) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (386) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (313) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”