The categories MF (Mega Funds), MM (Middle Market), and LMM (Lower Middle Market) primarily represent the size of the funds and the typical deal sizes they handle, rather than the strength or prestige of the firms. Each category tends to focus on different segments of the market due to varying strategies, resources, and expertise.

  1. Deal Size and Competition:

    • LMMs generally handle smaller deals and often focus on niche markets or specific industries. They typically compete against other LMMs or sometimes MM firms, depending on the nature of the deal.
    • MFs handle larger, often multi-billion dollar deals and usually do not compete directly with LMMs due to the difference in deal size and the resources required.
  2. Market Segmentation:

    • The reason MFs do not typically have dedicated LMM/MM deal teams to take market share in those segments is due to the different investment strategies and returns expectations. Mega Funds are structured to manage large sums of capital and pursue larger deals that promise sufficient returns on such capital scales. Smaller deals, like those handled by LMMs, may not meet the return thresholds required by MFs or justify the operational and due diligence costs relative to potential returns.
  3. Strategic Focus:

    • Each fund type has developed expertise and operational setups that cater to their specific market segments. MFs have built capabilities to manage complex, large-scale deals and negotiations, which differ significantly from the more hands-on, relationship-driven focus typical of LMM deals.

In summary, while all these funds operate in the private equity space, their strategies, target deal sizes, and competitive landscapes differ significantly, influencing whom they compete with and how they operate within the market.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/then-and-now-compbanker?customgpt=1, THEN and NOW: @CompBanker, Is it dumb to exit to LMM PE rather than starting in bigger (MF/UMM) opportunities first?, Are top MFins target programs for Private Equity firms?, MM pe vs MF

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Labore hic aut non laboriosam totam. Nostrum accusantium pariatur qui. Esse magni rerum est in voluptas rerum.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”