HEDGE FUNDS DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2019
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2017, 2018, 2019.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Two Sigma Investments
No
97.3%
D.E. Shaw
No
94.6%
Bridgewater Associates
No
91.9%
AQR Capital Management
No
89.2%
Citadel Investment Group
No
86.5%
Millennium Management
05
83.8%
The Tudor Group
New
81.1%
Bridgewater Associates LP
New
78.4%
Highland Capital Management
02
75.7%
Blackstone Group
06
73.0%
Point72
03
70.3%
Grosvenor Capital Management
New
67.6%
Millennium Partners
07
64.9%
Magnetar Capital
01
62.2%
Elliott Management Corporation
New
59.5%
GSO Capital Partners
New
56.8%
BlueCrest Capital Management
03
54.1%
Worldquant
05
51.4%
Balyasny Asset Management
04
48.6%
Squarepoint Capital
03
45.9%
Man Group
03
43.2%
Oaktree Capital Management
03
40.5%
Graham Capital Management
04
37.8%
Bracebridge Capital
01
35.1%
Foxhill Capital
01
32.4%
Ellington Management Group
04
29.7%
Farallon Capital Management
07
27.0%
Matrix Capital Management
New
24.3%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management
01
21.6%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb
18
18.9%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
MidOcean Partners (42.2%)
No
97.7%
Farallon Capital Management (41.1%)
No
95.3%
Oaktree Capital Management (34.6%)
02
93.0%
Man Group (31.9%)
01
90.7%
Bridgewater Associates (28.5%)
02
88.4%
Bridgewater Associates LP (26.4%)
19
86.0%
D.E. Shaw (22.7%)
10
83.7%
Point72 (22.6%)
02
81.4%
AQR Capital Management (18.8%)
09
79.1%
Arena Investors LP (18.5%)
New
76.7%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (18.5%)
01
74.4%
Bracebridge Capital (17.6%)
04
72.1%
Millennium Management (15.1%)
07
69.8%
Citadel Investment Group (11.5%)
No
67.4%
Two Sigma Investments (11.1%)
No
65.1%
Squarepoint Capital (11.1%)
No
62.8%
Ellington Management Group (11.1%)
04
60.5%
Graham Capital Management (9.3%)
07
58.1%
Blackstone Group (9.3%)
No
55.8%
Gluskin Sheff (2.2%)
11
53.5%
Baupost Group (2.2%)
03
51.2%
Third Point LLC (2.2%)
New
48.8%
GSO Capital Partners (2.2%)
New
46.5%
Elliott Management Corporation (2.2%)
New
44.2%
BlueCrest Capital Management (2.2%)
03
41.9%
Element Capital Management (2.2%)
03
39.5%
AllianceBernstein (1.8%)
05
37.2%
GoldenTree Asset Management (1.8%)
02
34.9%
Yakira Capital Management (1.8%)
New
32.6%
The Tudor Group (1.8%)
New
30.2%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
GoldenTree Asset Management (68.7%)
01
97.7%
Yakira Capital Management (68.7%)
New
95.3%
Och-Ziff Capital Management Group (29.5%)
05
93.0%
Bridgewater Associates LP (26.5%)
02
90.7%
Balyasny Asset Management (23.3%)
02
88.4%
Elliott Management Corporation (22.5%)
New
86.0%
Squarepoint Capital (21.7%)
04
83.7%
Arena Investors LP (18.7%)
New
81.4%
Bracebridge Capital (17.7%)
05
79.1%
Grosvenor Capital Management (14.0%)
New
76.7%
AQR Capital Management (13.8%)
05
74.4%
Magnetar Capital (12.5%)
29
72.1%
Oaktree Capital Management (12.5%)
01
69.8%
Ellington Management Group (11.2%)
02
67.4%
Citadel Investment Group (10.6%)
02
65.1%
Two Sigma Investments (9.8%)
03
62.8%
Blackstone Group (9.4%)
08
60.5%
Millennium Management (8.0%)
05
58.1%
D.E. Shaw (7.2%)
10
55.8%
Bridgewater Associates (6.9%)
05
53.5%
Worldquant (5.9%)
17
51.2%
Point72 (5.7%)
04
48.8%
Gluskin Sheff (2.5%)
07
46.5%
MidOcean Partners (2.5%)
02
44.2%
Baupost Group (2.5%)
02
41.9%
Third Point LLC (2.5%)
New
39.5%
GSO Capital Partners (2.5%)
New
37.2%
BlueCrest Capital Management (2.5%)
01
34.9%
Element Capital Management (2.5%)
01
32.6%
AllianceBernstein (2.1%)
09
30.2%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Arena Investors LP (16.8%)
New
97.7%
Two Sigma Investments (6.9%)
01
95.3%
Bridgewater Associates (6.8%)
01
93.0%
Citadel Investment Group (1.8%)
No
90.7%
D.E. Shaw (1.4%)
37
88.4%
Point72 (0.7%)
01
86.0%
Gluskin Sheff (0.2%)
12
83.7%
MidOcean Partners (0.2%)
No
81.4%
Baupost Group (0.2%)
01
79.1%
Third Point LLC (0.2%)
New
76.7%
Elliott Management Corporation (0.2%)
New
74.4%
GSO Capital Partners (0.2%)
New
72.1%
BlueCrest Capital Management (0.2%)
02
69.8%
Element Capital Management (0.2%)
02
67.4%
AllianceBernstein (0.2%)
08
65.1%
GoldenTree Asset Management (0.2%)
02
62.8%
Yakira Capital Management (0.2%)
New
60.5%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (0.2%)
04
58.1%
The Tudor Group (0.2%)
New
55.8%
Bloom Tree Partners (0.2%)
06
53.5%
SkyBridge Capital II, LLC (0.2%)
06
51.2%
Anson Funds (0.1%)
New
48.8%
Oak Hill Advisors (0.1%)
11
46.5%
Foxhill Capital (0.1%)
04
44.2%
Matrix Capital Management (0.1%)
New
41.9%
Grosvenor Capital Management (0.1%)
New
39.5%
Bridgewater Associates LP (0.1%)
16
37.2%
Oaktree Capital Management (0.1%)
05
34.9%
Farallon Capital Management (0.1%)
06
32.6%
Ellington Management Group (0.1%)
01
30.2%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?