The Decline of the Tie

I've been revisiting Wall Street archives from the '90s and '00s this weekend, and one unmistakable trend stands out in all of the interviews: the omnipresence of ties, which look absolutely stunning. Each tie is unique, with many boasting Hermes designs. The variety in patterns and colors seems to reflect the wearer's personality vividly. From vibrant ties worn by charismatic individuals to the understated blue ties chosen by more reserved interviewees, ties serve as a personal statement of style.

So I’m curious and I’m going to ask, and I know we're not exactly in the realm of fashion, but how did we allow such a quintessential element of our daily attire to gradually disappear?

 
Most Helpful

Time, efficiency, post-covid focus on comfort over looks

 
Controversial

This industry was so much better pre-covid. Everyone made an effort to look the part and dress for the job that they want rather than the job they have. Now Derek (23M, FO Coverage, Zoom Graduate) refuses to come into the office on a Tuesday and when he does he’s wearing comfort-line oxfords with white foam and a fucking stained quarter zip. Our bonuses were destroyed post-GFC. Our appearances were destroyed post-Covid.

 

Last I checked the quality of service delivered to clients isn’t determined by what brand the advisory team is wearing or whether they choose to wear a tie. As long as you present well to clients and dress for occasions why does it matter what people wear when they move pictures around on a slideshow? Now the compensation argument has some basis as there is a decline in that regard but wouldn’t you rather be comfortable when you work?

 

As someone who started in the 1990s, I like this discussion thread. I can tell you that some of us still hold on to remnants of the prior mindset, although a bit less relaxed.

During the 1980s, they had almost a militant approach... Visiting my father's office in the 1980s, I remember a few notable examples (e.g. "Suit jacket must be within three paces of your desk, if removed." and a banker being told to "Find a razor by noon, or don't come back.")

During the 1990s, Gen X entered finance and held on to earlier views, but adopted a slightly more relaxed approach. Suits were still expected, however.

During early-mid 2000s, it started to relax a lot, mostly due to Millennials entering the workforce.

Millennials (around the GFC) were likely the group who started with the relaxed attire, as I can't really remember seeing any of the no-tie, khakis, polos, or Patagonia vests, before Millennials.

As I see it, the "Midtown Uniform" as we know it today, was largely a product of the Millennial generation, as it didn't exist when I started.

Remember, Millennials were once viewed almost the same as Gen Z is viewed nowadays.

Each generation has added to the casual nature, but the most notable shift began with  Millennials around the GFC era.

Memories, ah yes, the memories... lol

Investor (30+ years); IB/RE/PE/Corp (MD level); currently, head of boutique private equity firm; principal of family office.
 

people stopped wearing ties well before covid

suit sans tie has been the dominant IB look for interns even since like 2017 / hell even for many client meetings

agree the shoe game is terrible right now / and so many ugly quarter zips on 22 year old analysts

 

Unde consequatur rerum corrupti. Aspernatur rem quasi dolor a dolorem aliquid numquam. Accusamus occaecati ut molestias tempore facilis ut omnis.

Voluptatum minima ipsa sit corrupti et enim eius. Molestiae necessitatibus aliquam consequuntur maxime culpa. Omnis tempora consectetur perspiciatis facere eos dignissimos nisi odio. Omnis deleniti repellendus voluptas sunt dicta aliquam. Dolor voluptatum voluptatem non similique. Provident voluptatem nemo consequatur nam.

Qui porro praesentium sint distinctio consequatur ipsum. Nemo eum dolores consequatur unde dolores et repudiandae porro. Voluptas quo repellat quia sit quam aperiam doloribus nisi. Maxime numquam explicabo repellendus rerum non quo omnis. Quia voluptatem qui esse. Alias recusandae error adipisci quis. Natus magni error ex.

Magnam magni earum pariatur nihil odio iusto. Fugiat eligendi minima voluptatibus qui quos. Aut quia dolore inventore sed.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”