Should I list my extracurriculars by relevance or in reverse chronology?
I've previously been part of a student-led fund where I was involved in equity research. I left a few months ago, after 2 years of involvement. Currently, I have other ongoing extracurriculars such as Cross-Country where I'm a varsity athlete.
However, for finance-related roles, the fund experience would be more relevant to the roles I'm applying for, which is why I want to highlight it first. However, I'm not sure if going against the conventions of listing in reverse chronology would be acceptable especially for high finance roles.
Would appreciate any input or advice for this issue.
Sint est consequuntur molestias illum aliquid nemo et. Impedit totam ut porro eum. Vel impedit enim et quisquam voluptatem et. Ut aut nostrum est eius quam aut similique.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...