Does anyone have insight into the internal restructuring/workout groups at the major PE/PC shops (Blackstone/Carlyle/Ares/Golub etc...)? Curious as to how these roles compare with other RX opportunities (Consulting, Banking) and the type of work one can expect. Thanks in advance.
Junior levels: RX Banking > PC Workouts > RX consulting
Mid-senior levels: PC Workouts => RX Banking > RX consulting.
I used to work in one of these groups. You ultimately do more stressed amendments with 4-6 group clubs in PC Workouts vs. restructuring work which isn't as technical as RX Banking and work can be a bit less exciting. Exit options are better from RX Banking than PC Workouts and the training is likely better in RX Banking.
At the senior level PC workouts has a pretty good lifestyle, you get to negotiate most of the time, RX bankers and consultants do alot of the heavy lifting, and you still can play in interesting situations. You get control and autonomy that has often been earned from your time in RX banking.
Exit options from PC workout groups at namebrand places generally are similar to buckets to RX banking analysts on the distressed / special sits side except a sizeable minority of distressed firms won't interview and you don't have the same L/S and PE exit options.
Note this is specific to PC workout groups which the firms you list have separate from their distressed and opportunistic credit verticals. So if you are in the "portfolio management / restructuring group at Ares vs. the Special opps group", "special sits at Golub vs. Opportunistic Credit", "portfolio management / restructuring at Carlyle vs. their strategic partners or opportunistic group", "blackstone credit restructuring vs. blackstone tac opps / distressed / special opps". KKR restructuring vs. KKR Opportunities etc.
Exits from the latter portion of those firms are going to be different than the PC workout groups and generally are much better. Other firms may merge the two groups as well.
Other DD questions for the groups are (i) whether they do restructurings of the equity portfolio as debtors as well (ii) how often they are willing to put in money / what situations will they put in money (iii) how many assets they have the keys on and (iv) willingness to play in liability management transactions. Alot of groups vary on these points and this also has an effect on experience.
How easy/common to lateral from PC workouts (the “former”) to a distressed inv seat. Can imagine there may be pushback doing so internally but there’s surely a lot of skillset overlap that could be leveraged for external opps?
Est et aut eveniet non. Sequi quae et quaerat corporis sit. Tempora occaecati aut nam soluta at. In ea ab fuga asperiores exercitationem eum itaque.
Est eos qui officia dicta enim. Molestiae aut quasi et consequatur non dolorum. Nesciunt quia eaque facere exercitationem. In in aut nihil qui tempore ut vero. Sint asperiores facere et repellendus architecto perspiciatis architecto. Eius delectus nulla velit et. Distinctio architecto vel et neque corrupti.
Voluptatem voluptas et aspernatur dolores aut sint. Est debitis voluptates ullam et quaerat. Blanditiis rerum deleniti et tenetur necessitatibus dolore. Enim quia illum maxime et optio architecto. Natus odit enim et deserunt. Non fuga assumenda est quo ex laudantium. A consequatur ut modi eligendi labore nostrum repellat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
I'd rank the experiences following as.
Junior levels: RX Banking > PC Workouts > RX consulting
Mid-senior levels: PC Workouts => RX Banking > RX consulting.
I used to work in one of these groups. You ultimately do more stressed amendments with 4-6 group clubs in PC Workouts vs. restructuring work which isn't as technical as RX Banking and work can be a bit less exciting. Exit options are better from RX Banking than PC Workouts and the training is likely better in RX Banking.
At the senior level PC workouts has a pretty good lifestyle, you get to negotiate most of the time, RX bankers and consultants do alot of the heavy lifting, and you still can play in interesting situations. You get control and autonomy that has often been earned from your time in RX banking.
Exit options from PC workout groups at namebrand places generally are similar to buckets to RX banking analysts on the distressed / special sits side except a sizeable minority of distressed firms won't interview and you don't have the same L/S and PE exit options.
Note this is specific to PC workout groups which the firms you list have separate from their distressed and opportunistic credit verticals. So if you are in the "portfolio management / restructuring group at Ares vs. the Special opps group", "special sits at Golub vs. Opportunistic Credit", "portfolio management / restructuring at Carlyle vs. their strategic partners or opportunistic group", "blackstone credit restructuring vs. blackstone tac opps / distressed / special opps". KKR restructuring vs. KKR Opportunities etc.
Exits from the latter portion of those firms are going to be different than the PC workout groups and generally are much better. Other firms may merge the two groups as well.
Other DD questions for the groups are (i) whether they do restructurings of the equity portfolio as debtors as well (ii) how often they are willing to put in money / what situations will they put in money (iii) how many assets they have the keys on and (iv) willingness to play in liability management transactions. Alot of groups vary on these points and this also has an effect on experience.
Thanks very much for the thorough response!
How easy/common to lateral from PC workouts (the “former”) to a distressed inv seat. Can imagine there may be pushback doing so internally but there’s surely a lot of skillset overlap that could be leveraged for external opps?
Est et aut eveniet non. Sequi quae et quaerat corporis sit. Tempora occaecati aut nam soluta at. In ea ab fuga asperiores exercitationem eum itaque.
Est eos qui officia dicta enim. Molestiae aut quasi et consequatur non dolorum. Nesciunt quia eaque facere exercitationem. In in aut nihil qui tempore ut vero. Sint asperiores facere et repellendus architecto perspiciatis architecto. Eius delectus nulla velit et. Distinctio architecto vel et neque corrupti.
Voluptatem voluptas et aspernatur dolores aut sint. Est debitis voluptates ullam et quaerat. Blanditiis rerum deleniti et tenetur necessitatibus dolore. Enim quia illum maxime et optio architecto. Natus odit enim et deserunt. Non fuga assumenda est quo ex laudantium. A consequatur ut modi eligendi labore nostrum repellat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...