WALT calc accounting for rent bumps

I am underwriting a three tenant (each tenant is NN) medical office building deal (3 doctors) and want to calculate the Weighted Average Lease Term on the building accounting for the 3% annual rent bumps over each of their respective lease terms.

I know WALT is the sum of individual tenant rent (economic rent) divided by total rent multiplied by remaining lease term. How do I account for the year over year rent bumps? Thanks.

 

This explains it nicely:

For example, if there is a 10,000 sf building with 3 tenants tenant A leases 5,000 square feet and pays $10.00 per square foot for 5 years, tenant B leases 3,000 square feet and pays $12.00 per square foot for 3 years and tenant C leases 2,000 square feet at $6.00 per square foot for 7 years. First compute total rent (5,000 x $10.00) + (3,000 x $12.00) + (2,000 x $6.00) = $98,000. Then compute the percentage of rent each tenant accounts for: A = 51.02%, B=36.73% and C=12.24%. Then multiple the percentages by lease term and sum together: A (2.55 years) + B(1.10 years) + C (0.86 years) = 4.51 years. This is for economic rent, but the same principle applies if calculated based on occupancy (square footage).

 
Best Response

I have never seen it done this way. WALT generally refers to just the term weighted on tenant size because you are trying to see on average how much space you're getting back. What you're describing would be average duration of in-place income. You have to be careful with this because there could be TI's/other income that is being included/excluded that you don't know about which would skew these numbers.

Regarding OP's question on the rent bumps, this wouldn't really matter if the bumps are all the same (3%). All of the rents are going to go up proportionately.

"Who am I? I'm the guy that does his job. You must be the other guy."
 

Rerum dolor et quis ratione consequatur delectus quasi. Facilis repellendus pariatur vel cumque praesentium delectus aut. Recusandae aliquam qui et est.

Laboriosam omnis voluptates non consectetur minima et. Molestiae quia et consectetur. Tenetur saepe et et aut quaerat qui animi.

Dicta laudantium illum eum. Non animi nisi neque velit neque. Architecto et assumenda nesciunt et veritatis laboriosam. Rerum veniam commodi sint ea. Quos quasi impedit in alias. Possimus dignissimos et et explicabo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (92) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”