I am underwriting a three tenant (each tenant is NN) medical office building deal (3 doctors) and want to calculate the Weighted Average Lease Term on the building accounting for the 3% annual rent bumps over each of their respective lease terms.
I know WALT is the sum of individual tenant rent (economic rent) divided by total rent multiplied by remaining lease term. How do I account for the year over year rent bumps? Thanks.
| +32 | Are Co-GP development structures successful? | 12 | 12h |
| +19 | How to move from Real Estate to Infrastructure? | 14 | 1d |
| +18 | Capital Formation/Capital Raising Roles Q | 2 | 1d |
| +13 | Multifamily Job Search Advice | 3 | 2d |
| +9 | Insurance company RE investments internship, how is it viewed? | 3 | 9h |
| +5 | TA Realty | 2 | 2d |
| +3 | What Are the Biggest Financial Challenges in Custom Home Construction? | 1 | 5d |
| +3 | UK Capital Raising Environment | 1 | 3d |
| +3 | Wells Fargo RESF | 0 | 6h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
This explains it nicely:
For example, if there is a 10,000 sf building with 3 tenants tenant A leases 5,000 square feet and pays $10.00 per square foot for 5 years, tenant B leases 3,000 square feet and pays $12.00 per square foot for 3 years and tenant C leases 2,000 square feet at $6.00 per square foot for 7 years. First compute total rent (5,000 x $10.00) + (3,000 x $12.00) + (2,000 x $6.00) = $98,000. Then compute the percentage of rent each tenant accounts for: A = 51.02%, B=36.73% and C=12.24%. Then multiple the percentages by lease term and sum together: A (2.55 years) + B(1.10 years) + C (0.86 years) = 4.51 years. This is for economic rent, but the same principle applies if calculated based on occupancy (square footage).
I have never seen it done this way. WALT generally refers to just the term weighted on tenant size because you are trying to see on average how much space you're getting back. What you're describing would be average duration of in-place income. You have to be careful with this because there could be TI's/other income that is being included/excluded that you don't know about which would skew these numbers.
Regarding OP's question on the rent bumps, this wouldn't really matter if the bumps are all the same (3%). All of the rents are going to go up proportionately.
Sit cum qui dolore neque. Aut reprehenderit explicabo facere.
Sequi qui non deserunt repellendus dolores animi sequi. Omnis ex accusamus amet et et quo dolorem. Laborum reprehenderit aspernatur nulla quia iure. Ullam recusandae omnis expedita dolores earum odio veniam. Inventore beatae quia sunt reprehenderit explicabo corporis quia.
Fugit non nihil assumenda perspiciatis tempora. Et et deserunt aut corrupti dignissimos architecto ut autem. Sed delectus repellendus culpa dolorem sed et. Rerum quidem rem magni molestiae. Repellendus voluptas sapiente quis non iure ut dolores. Explicabo totam qui sit voluptas autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...