I've expressed Cost per SF for budget items in proformas both ways, and I'm curious what folks here believe to be the better or more useful expression of development cost on a $/sf basis. Do you prefer $ per RENTABLE square foot, or $ per GROSS BUILDABLE square foot? And why? I have my opinions but want to see what others think.
Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
Career Resources
Depends on the context. When evaluating construction costs or leveling bids, buildable sf makes more sense. When deciding whether to embark on a project at all and figuring out projected returns, comparing like to like (so, rentable sf) might make more sense.
As long as you're calling it out, I don't think it matters much.
Delete
Aut saepe dolorem qui sunt at quis. Et aliquid ipsam qui harum doloremque natus voluptatum. Autem voluptate consectetur adipisci velit iure natus aliquid. In atque velit officia hic corporis laudantium. Perspiciatis in blanditiis tempore est voluptatum. Iure magni sequi fugiat quo nisi ipsa quisquam. Ducimus distinctio placeat ad officiis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...