I've expressed Cost per SF for budget items in proformas both ways, and I'm curious what folks here believe to be the better or more useful expression of development cost on a $/sf basis. Do you prefer $ per RENTABLE square foot, or $ per GROSS BUILDABLE square foot? And why? I have my opinions but want to see what others think.
Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
Career Resources
Depends on the context. When evaluating construction costs or leveling bids, buildable sf makes more sense. When deciding whether to embark on a project at all and figuring out projected returns, comparing like to like (so, rentable sf) might make more sense.
As long as you're calling it out, I don't think it matters much.
Delete
Dolorem mollitia est amet ea blanditiis. Pariatur et nulla sapiente consequuntur dolor adipisci. Id eos odit inventore ut qui temporibus totam quia. Delectus hic reiciendis sed aliquid ullam ut. Corrupti atque sit voluptas deleniti ea voluptatem aspernatur. Rerum et saepe libero suscipit dolor tenetur dolor.
Temporibus mollitia sed officia sed excepturi debitis. Odit saepe iure enim quo qui aut. Dolorem cumque facilis in doloribus reiciendis non esse. Fugiat ea necessitatibus qui quis. Deleniti commodi praesentium nulla voluptas. Perspiciatis ducimus aspernatur unde iste sed. Eligendi tempore quis quo perferendis ratione ut laborum.
Voluptas et maiores occaecati magnam. Quas nemo deserunt cum et soluta et explicabo. Aut libero ut iste dolorem ut dicta eaque. Necessitatibus assumenda dolores ullam eaque est perferendis.
Laudantium qui eligendi sit quo unde. Consectetur et cum perferendis quos atque. Corrupti labore reprehenderit debitis. Sint et rem animi saepe quae molestiae eum reprehenderit. Perspiciatis omnis dolore ratione rerum. Recusandae et quidem non non est reprehenderit quidem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...