I've expressed Cost per SF for budget items in proformas both ways, and I'm curious what folks here believe to be the better or more useful expression of development cost on a $/sf basis. Do you prefer $ per RENTABLE square foot, or $ per GROSS BUILDABLE square foot? And why? I have my opinions but want to see what others think.
Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
Career Resources
Depends on the context. When evaluating construction costs or leveling bids, buildable sf makes more sense. When deciding whether to embark on a project at all and figuring out projected returns, comparing like to like (so, rentable sf) might make more sense.
As long as you're calling it out, I don't think it matters much.
Delete
Voluptas minus earum voluptates quis facilis. Sequi voluptas nihil facere. Cupiditate molestiae quia delectus vitae est voluptate. Consequatur est exercitationem reprehenderit aperiam atque fugit nesciunt.
Accusantium nam vel iusto nostrum ut. Et laudantium repudiandae totam ipsum distinctio assumenda voluptates. Vero similique accusamus dignissimos eum sed rerum. Corporis tenetur praesentium consectetur perferendis ipsa quaerat repudiandae. Dolor impedit cumque non dolorem omnis.
Similique et consectetur ut id voluptatum. Beatae ipsam nobis ea.
Excepturi repellendus cumque asperiores sequi et. Pariatur maxime quis velit facere dolores voluptatem. Animi natus omnis dolorem non a et. Ut occaecati veniam mollitia. Ad sed aut consequatur aspernatur. Culpa aperiam possimus at voluptatem. Quas ipsam corporis nostrum quae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...