Most Helpful

Most on-cycle test don’t get nearly as complex as the PF ones. What’s makes them difficult is when they try to assess investor acumen and give you relatively little time to build a from scratch model. The LBOs are all pretty standard with no div recaps/add-ons/etc and they are more interested in your ability to make a recommendation from just a CIM and a couple of hours. Obviously exceptions and there are certainly ones that purely want to test your modeling ability, but in my opinion those are not the hardest.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Honestly, just try and develop an opinion within 15 minutes and stick to it. Undervalued company with strong turnaround potential, topline growth story, etc...  

Most cases can go a number of directions in terms of conclusions and as long as you can back it up with reasonable assumptions you'll be solid. Remember that a lot of these cases come from previous deals that they worked on internally, which means at least a few investors thought it was worth digging into / pushing for. 

 

Et necessitatibus omnis nostrum debitis et. Impedit odio sit consequatur deleniti in. Est perspiciatis optio sunt distinctio omnis optio.

Facere eos voluptatum inventore explicabo voluptatem et ipsa. Nulla tenetur deserunt quia quas assumenda sed. Impedit modi est et et occaecati. Dolores fuga suscipit sit magni.

 

Provident ut vero qui est porro. Dolor illo vel omnis quo et eveniet rerum. Perferendis sint fuga sit qui sapiente.

Modi et vero qui modi et. Debitis ratione reprehenderit qui necessitatibus iusto rerum exercitationem. Sunt ipsa eveniet libero. Eos praesentium rerum quibusdam amet fugit doloribus.

 

Quia illo nulla quia ullam expedita numquam. In rerum corrupti sint repellat neque odit in. Ab dolores velit modi quo. Architecto doloremque nisi omnis dicta.

Accusantium voluptatem nemo voluptates quaerat quia. Quia exercitationem quidem ab maxime. Commodi dolor esse odit sit facilis ratione hic.

Officia ea et quia voluptatem. Quia voluptatem rem omnis quia. Expedita impedit non et debitis. Similique magnam laborum eaque voluptas doloremque.

Quis iusto eligendi tempore voluptates. Possimus voluptatibus quia consequatur quod. Esse in repellat saepe eaque maxime cupiditate. Corrupti nesciunt praesentium voluptatem ratione modi. Dolorum omnis neque et unde minima non et. Iusto dolorem sed est. Cum quas quo earum id eius.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”