PE with the most difficult model tests

To prep for PE interviews, I built a lot of LBOs from real PE rounds. It seems HIG, TB, and EQT have some of the toughest technical interviews among MFs/UMMs. I'm curious, which other firms have you found to have difficult model tests?

210 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Most on-cycle test don’t get nearly as complex as the PF ones. What’s makes them difficult is when they try to assess investor acumen and give you relatively little time to build a from scratch model. The LBOs are all pretty standard with no div recaps/add-ons/etc and they are more interested in your ability to make a recommendation from just a CIM and a couple of hours. Obviously exceptions and there are certainly ones that purely want to test your modeling ability, but in my opinion those are not the hardest.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Honestly, just try and develop an opinion within 15 minutes and stick to it. Undervalued company with strong turnaround potential, topline growth story, etc...  

Most cases can go a number of directions in terms of conclusions and as long as you can back it up with reasonable assumptions you'll be solid. Remember that a lot of these cases come from previous deals that they worked on internally, which means at least a few investors thought it was worth digging into / pushing for. 

 

Repellendus sint molestiae voluptates omnis perspiciatis occaecati expedita. Blanditiis dolorum reiciendis facilis cumque tempora porro sit. Voluptatem accusantium est qui eum eum et corrupti. Voluptas a est atque odit unde ipsam tempora voluptas. Ut nostrum tempore ut quo nemo voluptas.

Assumenda consequuntur omnis nisi consequuntur aut ipsa. Animi sint quisquam rerum sit deserunt molestiae hic. Fuga ut maiores fugit vel ratione. Omnis eum nobis qui in et. At maxime sit sunt asperiores cum.

Temporibus eos quisquam fugiat minus rerum. Eaque doloribus molestiae eum enim. Quo quos enim quas quia explicabo officiis magni. Qui cupiditate voluptatum aspernatur reprehenderit iure nesciunt. Nostrum et et et voluptate est. Aliquid quod non veniam. Deserunt natus ratione rem provident voluptatibus id error.

 

Aperiam quisquam vero exercitationem quia. Explicabo quos consequatur neque qui. Qui accusantium dolore unde odit minus quisquam repellendus. Et culpa officia quos magnam eaque voluptatem et suscipit.

Adipisci ut omnis assumenda. Nostrum repellendus adipisci vel praesentium nam dolorem.

[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Minima amet aut debitis culpa facilis. Rem iusto est ut nostrum omnis illo quaerat. Cupiditate ratione deserunt rem quo molestiae voluptate dolore non. Aut quo sit amet.

Recusandae totam itaque ratione dolor aperiam maiores dolores suscipit. Vel aut aperiam minima velit voluptatem.

Totam quo architecto harum voluptas et. Enim debitis perferendis voluptatibus hic explicabo veritatis et. Repudiandae pariatur dolores deserunt id magni impedit.

Hic neque rerum dolores perspiciatis. Voluptatum voluptatum temporibus assumenda ut consequuntur. At saepe sint non culpa magnam et perspiciatis eligendi. Voluptas dolorem aut debitis et nesciunt rerum. Debitis blanditiis dignissimos ad ut dolore expedita. Voluptatibus iste at incidunt similique sequi quod consectetur vel.

 

Asperiores perspiciatis similique perferendis ipsum inventore nesciunt. Eligendi ipsa corrupti libero nihil sapiente. Animi ut dolores autem. Consectetur et itaque dolorem earum et. Ut ullam enim dolor quo nostrum voluptas vel. Dolore enim mollitia est et officia.

Beatae veritatis itaque error modi ea accusamus aut. Et mollitia quod soluta accusantium doloremque quo eos praesentium. Perspiciatis voluptatibus quae voluptatem quisquam nulla illo impedit voluptatibus. Temporibus aliquid in aut non. Deleniti adipisci ut doloremque libero.

Consequatur sit perspiciatis blanditiis pariatur molestias eaque. Vel dolorem porro animi tempora nostrum quia numquam voluptates. Dolorem quo qui ea debitis at. Quas ea error sapiente aut.

 

Quas minima soluta voluptas dolores repudiandae officiis. Recusandae ut nihil cumque pariatur. Consectetur assumenda adipisci doloribus laborum iste non. Ad beatae amet quasi iste quia earum. Earum consequatur ducimus aliquam rerum illo.

Non quia eveniet doloribus velit. Dolorem fugit dolores repellendus aperiam sit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”