Why wouldn't higher interest rates somewhat stimulate the economy?

I have a question regarding the idea that higher interest rates result in economy contracting, which I can definitely see since low interest rates = low cost of capital. However, my macroeconomics professor in college taught that higher rates were necessary to incentivize consumers and businesses to save, which was required for investment - countries will low savings rate struggle to develop. I'm having a hard time reconciling the two concepts, since they seem to contradict - to what extent are higher interest rates necessary to saving, thus investment growth?

 

Higher interest rates create uncertainty around market returns, so people turn to savings and interest for guaranteed returns. Higher savings does boost investment, but over the long term.

Looking at an individual, it’s not logical that they increase their savings rate and investment rate at the same time. But, after a period of increased saving they will have excess capital to deploy across selected investments when confidence in the market returns.

 
User52

Higher interest rates create uncertainty around market returns, so people turn to savings and interest for guaranteed returns. Higher savings does boost investment, but over the long term.

So at the onset of higher rates, there would be temporary boost in savings which would spur investment for a short while? 

 
Most Helpful

Look at it this way - We’re coming from a period where we had gotten used to low rates, leverage was cheap relative to what it is now. Projects could be funded at >8-9x EBITDA and little needed to be put upfront as equity since liquidity was both cheap and readily available for financing growth since banks/credit investors could either sit on cash or deploy it in a red hot market. Corporates could support higher leverage levels on floating rate debt since interest payments weren’t painful enough as they’ve gotten now as both benchmark rates and spreads have gone up with terms on credit getting tighter.

Any household with surplus cash doesn’t want to pursue high risk investment options (stocks and highly leveraged fixed income instruments) since they could just put their money in 10yr Treasuries or other risk-off options for decent returns.

Neoclassical economics however tells us that an individual wants to maximise their lifetime utility function (a.k.a opportunity cost of consumption in high rate periods is high and hence saving is preferred which then leads to higher investment levels in subsequent periods spurring growth). This is in line with what you may see in markets now (move to risk-off govt bonds) and rotation to risk-on securities or investments once policy rates come down and risk-off investments becomes less attractive over time.

 

Lower rates are good for incentivizing investment. Higher real rates do incentivize savings which increases deposits which should lower rates which then incentivizes investment.  That's partially why we call it a business cycle. However, it doesn't all happen at once.

Also, the Fed intervenes before this process is allowed to play out. 

 

Ipsum quaerat voluptatem eligendi est quis voluptatum voluptatem. Voluptatem quo odit voluptas et. Aspernatur eius iure unde tempora mollitia at tempore.

Possimus est quod aut non minima dolore qui aspernatur. Animi aut doloribus sint molestiae officia. Reiciendis doloribus cum ea molestias. Laboriosam a voluptas et libero incidunt necessitatibus.

Id id quisquam nihil facilis provident voluptatem deserunt consequatur. Sapiente saepe sunt ut id vero fuga. Totam consequatur quam voluptatibus dolore ullam voluptatem.

Qui eum necessitatibus voluptas modi exercitationem error nulla quo. Qui omnis explicabo facilis praesentium. Distinctio non et aut occaecati ea molestias. Commodi eius repellendus neque aliquam voluptatem. In odit corporis voluptatem non corporis. Iure eum debitis soluta aspernatur magni. Illo consectetur necessitatibus rerum rerum exercitationem cupiditate.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 06 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”