Interesting that there’s been so much commentary on DBO recently. Not providing a ranking as those are largely useless without specific detail from the person.

Are you interested in particular sectors / products? Are you considering a career in banking? Are you maximizing FT recruiting opportunities? Does geography matter to you?

These questions are honestly impossible to answer / generate some REALLY useless responses without more detail. If the GHL offer is RX or if you’re interested in a PU or TMT etc. or if you prefer various work cultures all matter. A generalized ranking of (randomly) Barclays > GHL > UBS with DBO thrown in there somewhere does you no good - especially when comparing banks like Barclays and UBS in which cultures and dealflow vary significantly across groups.

 

I second this.

DBO would be perfect for someone who's trying to become a career banker. Fast track to promotion, great comp, brilliant partners/team, and expanding strategically.

Barclays/Greenhill would make a lot more sense if you are trying to go into buy-side. They have a much bigger name, which would help you get to where you want.

 

I'd choose Barclays. Most coverage groups are strong and solid exits to PE. Barclays and Greenhill are similar in terms of exits, so if you prefer small class sizes, go to Greenhill M&A. Then I'd go UBS since they still have decent exit opps to MM PE. They also have a widely recognized global brand name so that's a plus I personally would not choose DBO. I've never heard of it but it may be a solid bank idk Barclays >= Greenhill > UBS > DBO

 

DBO is a boutique located in SF. Founders/Partners were ex-heads of groups/divisions Morgan Stanley. Great exposure on deals and work with very smart people. EB level comp, but long hours. PE exits aren't amazing, but they exist.

 

Why is this guy getting MS? UBS, while not what it once was, still has established exits to MM PE and is a global brand name Barclays = Greenhill > UBS > DBO

 

Barclays > Greenhill >> UBS/DBO

DBO is out of the question unless you know that you want to be on the West Coast. I'm assuming all of your other offers are for NYC. If you want to be a career banker and work in the West Coast, DBO may be one of the best options: higher comp, fast track promotions, strong deal flow and very smart people. Again, don't think about DBO unless you only want to be on the WC.

UBS is out of the question because you have a better BB offer. I could somewhat understand the UBS vs. Greenhill debate if you hate the EB model, and die for BB. However in your situation, I wouldn't overthink it.

I think it comes down to Barclays vs. Greenhill. Again, what is your preference for BB vs. EB? Is your Greenhill offer generalist or RX?

Barclays is known to be the best culture BB. They have very strong coverage groups, with great exits to PE and deal flow. Good brand name outside of finance as well. CON: weaker product groups

Greenhill will give you slightly higher comp, more responsibility (leaner deal teams, however you should know that some Barclays coverage groups run pretty lean as well), RX capability.

 

You'll have better exits at Barclays/Greenhill regardless. DBO exits into mostly WC MM/LMM funds. The only scenario would be if you are just a super quality candidate and network into some top WC fund, but then the firm wouldn't really matter.

 

I think there definitely is a scenario. I think the name brand from Barclays (as one bulge bracket example from the ones you named) could take you further than DBO in a vacuum, but I think it’s a lot more likely that partners at DBO go to bat for you in buy side interviews. Good luck getting a partner to do any favors for you at all at Barclays or UBS, maybe even GHL (I know it’s a boutique, but I don’t work there so I don’t know to what extent you’d have partner exposure). As the above comments have pointed out, I don’t think there’s one right answer between Barclays, DBO, and Greenhill. Depends on who you are/where you want to be

 

I'm just an incoming analyst at a bank not listed here, but when I was networking with people at Barclays, a couple of analysts mentioned that MDs went to bat for them(obviously not partners, but group head was mentioned). Also, GHL is small enough where working with a partner is somewhat likely.

I think for traditional buyout, Barclays is the pretty clear choice, but for growth/VC there's a case for DBO. DBO also used to be a bit stronger a few years ago whereas Barclays seems to be on a strong upward trend.

Definitely agree that UBS is the obvious no, not really any upside at all in going to a platform that is withering out in NA.

 

Quo eveniet nemo ducimus accusantium fugiat ipsa. Sit temporibus qui et ea consequatur velit fugit fugiat. Occaecati porro ut sint voluptas. Itaque tempore quae delectus numquam quaerat.

Nihil unde ut vero quam enim ut autem. Ipsam laborum adipisci architecto molestiae laborum a et. Eveniet eaque consequatur sit sit ut ex. Eveniet consequuntur ad est magni fugit amet fugit. Quod fuga reiciendis dolorum asperiores voluptas et aspernatur.

Et veritatis qui iste sit iure deleniti reiciendis. Esse reiciendis aut eligendi porro. Architecto est sint et similique. Veritatis distinctio aliquid maxime nihil qui accusamus a. Aut doloremque nulla ab quidem quia voluptatem quia.

Pariatur porro quia corporis porro suscipit ipsam doloribus. Ullam est reprehenderit qui est amet ducimus. Earum minima corporis praesentium distinctio. Modi pariatur et vel. Quae ipsa velit esse amet aut. Ut eos enim rem beatae voluptas voluptatum.

 

Ea saepe ut dolores. Amet dolorem voluptas cumque. Itaque dicta vel natus ipsum est et. Debitis rerum necessitatibus ex laboriosam minima similique. Excepturi impedit porro et expedita.

Ut reprehenderit amet esse. Sint repellendus quidem reprehenderit ut. Ut beatae quis et autem ratione. Est dolor numquam consequatur iure reiciendis.

Veniam eos sit qui in. Porro accusantium est magnam ut quisquam hic illo. Et nihil aut provident iste.

Quis ut numquam quam deserunt repellat est. Occaecati modi esse reiciendis perferendis dicta. Exercitationem adipisci autem quia eum. Neque aut ab qui esse ratione. Facilis ut harum error neque doloribus ad. A voluptates possimus explicabo. Inventore officia debitis ab qui et quam aut quod.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 06 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”