Starting in a strong but boring group (e.g. GS Nat Res, FIG)?

Hi

Does any of you have experience of joining a relatively strong group in an industry you found to be boring from the outset, with the intention of exiting after 2 years? For example, would you join a group like FIG or natural resources (or whichever industry group you might find boring) at places like GS just for the exit opportunities?

I really enjoyed my time at a PE and would like to go into the industry later down the line. However, based on my EB experience found IB to be relatively mindless and repetitive, and I am afraid combining this with a boring group would make for quite miserable analyst years. On the other hand, I guess you mostly end up just plugging numbers into templates and changing font colors back and forth as per the MD's brilliant insight, so not sure whether the group ends up mattering so much for the day-to-day work.

Any thoughts on this?

 

Nat Res can be some of the most complicated modeling and deal making, could definitely benefit from the technical skills you will earn there beyond more traditional groups and eventually switch, maybe post-mba or down market.

FIG is a top revenue generator for almost every bank, not as sexy, but bonuses are high post analyst level

 

How do you feel Nat Res does in terms of placing to conventional PE funds / do you think there is a risk of being pigeonholed into interviewing with just infrastructure funds?

 

Definitely a pigeonhole risk, but it depends on the groups m&a activity. Less LBOs in Nat Res, but PE makes big investments in the space. Thats why it may have to be a LMM shop or post MBA.

 

In case the exit opportunities from Nat Res beyond infrastructure funds (which I am not interested at all in) are post MBA (very difficult without pre-MBA PE experience?) or to LMM shops, the choice seems quite unattractive in my case given I also have a MBB offer. Not only am I confident I'd be able to also land a LMM spot from there, but the work would be more interesting for me personally and I would get broader industry exposure.

Am I missing something with this line of thinking?

 

Ducimus eaque totam sit. A occaecati consectetur et quas esse facilis. Nihil et occaecati ut occaecati incidunt ullam modi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.9%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 04 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (148) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”