Soccer Star Achraf Hakimi faces divorce, but all his assets are in Mom's name - wife now claims rape
Soccer Star Achraf Hakimi Defeats Ex-Wife Hiba Abouk In Divorce With Incredibly Smart Ploy – OutKick
"Editor’s Note: After publishing the story, it was brought to my attention that Achraf Hakimi is facing preliminary charges for rape in Paris.
Preliminary charges in the French legal system occur when a judge has strong reason to believe there is a crime yet it allows time for more investigation before a possible trial. If true, all of the following commentary is bunk and I immediately throw my support in his ex-wife’s corner.
In response to their recent efforts, I’ve decided to relaunch Anheuser-Busch’s “Real Men of Genius” marketing campaign. The first bro I’m anointing as a “brainiac” is Moroccan soccer star Achraf Hakimi who defeated his ex-wife, Hiba Abouk, in a divorce battle.
Hakimi’s divorce situation could’ve been as lame as any New Yorker or Californian. Meaning, Hakimi may have been on the hook to pay his ex-lady — Abouk — at least half of his soccer earnings.
This dude makes roughly $1.1 million per month! If it were me, I might go Fargo on Abouk instead of paying $550K every four weeks, even if she were the mother of my child. With that kind of money, I could just pay for a nanny.
However, it didn’t come to that because Hakimi had an ace up his sleeve. Apparently, this brilliant man registered his assets under his mother’s name. He included clothes, cars, and real estate."
HAHAHAHA get fooked ya raggedy gash, ya get nothin. What an absolute chad. Frankly, that's a brilliant idea in this day and age ASSUMING your mother is actually smart about money and respects you enough not to do anything stupid. "Gold diggers hate this 1 simple trick"
Big Tymers - Still Fly
[Intro: Birdman]
What's up, Fresh it's our turn, baby
[Chorus: Mannie Fresh]
Gator boots with the pimped out Gucci suits (Them Gucci suits)
Ain't got no job (Ayy-ayy, ayy-ayy), but I stay shive (I stay shive)
Can't pay my rent (I can't pay my rent) 'cause all my money's spent
But that's okay, 'cause I'm still fly (I'm so fly)
Got a quarter tank of gas in my new E class
But that's alright, 'cause I'm gon' ride (Ho-ho-hood rich)
Got everything in my momma name
But I'm hood rich, la-da-di-da da-da-da-da
if he did this in the US, would he get away with it too? or would the lawyer be able to argue he was hiding his assets?
Not a law professional so not sure but can it be argued as 'frauduent conveyence' ?
Anyway good for him for being able to protect his assets.
Legendary
What a chad. In an era of simps this is a brilliant move. Men need to learn how to protect themselves from predatory divorce courts. I don't understand how you can be entitled to half of someone's earnings because you were married to them. Did she give up on a career that would make her 1 million a month just to be with this guy? Probably not.
If you don't want to split your earnings, don't get married. I don't understand takes like yours - no one is holding a gun to the guy's head to making him say "I do." There is nothing "predatory" about divorce courts; this shit is all known ahead of time, and if you make a million bucks a month you have the resources to figure that out.
And for what it's worth... it seems like she absolutely can make a case her career would have paid her a lot. Obviously the only details known are the ones in the papers, but she's a reasonably well known model and actress.
But the moral of the story is that if you can't keep it in your pants, just don't get married! Derek Jeter slept with half of NYC and he's still beloved, because he was smart enough not to marry the first hot woman that came along. Marriage is a contract, and if you break the terms of it, you deserve to lose half.
Yes, well like you said, it was all known ahead of time, he had the resources to figure it out and he took action to prevent a negative outcome for himself. Can't be mad that he chose to register all his earnings under his mother's name.
We're never going to agree because I fundamentally disagree with the way divorces are handled. I don't think assets should be split 50-50. If someone made 90% of that pile they should keep most of it. If someone claims they lost earnings based on marital responsibilities they should prove how much in potential earnings they lost based on degrees, career trajectory etc. This woman, by the way, stayed active during her marriage and shot more movies. 100% people this rich have nannies to take care of the kids.
She’s also considered richer than him on paper and he will be entitled to up to 50% of her assets which would be ~$3million.
Everything is in his mum’s name so when he wants something, he just asks her to buy it. Your mum will never betray you but some of these girls..
Similique qui omnis nihil et voluptas qui et repellat. Dolor et deleniti sequi temporibus nulla. Totam vitae rerum ipsam non dicta. Voluptas et sunt quis deserunt.
Ut nostrum ex pariatur quas. Deleniti sunt impedit voluptatibus quam natus voluptatum dolorem vel.
Iusto ab consequuntur molestiae dolorum laborum dolor. Quia laborum ipsum cupiditate atque odio. Quae quisquam tenetur est voluptatem. Quod reiciendis minus dolor aut. Id commodi rerum veritatis dolores adipisci deserunt nulla. Tenetur vero fuga dolores adipisci ut. Quidem voluptatem repellat et odit quisquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...