Multifamily Development Budget - Architecture & Engineerings Costs
What is typical architectural cost and engineering cost for a ground-up multifamily development of 25-50 units? For architecture fees I have heard and read figures ranging from 3% of hard construction cost to 8% of total project cost...if the total project cost was $10-15 million with square footage of 24-36K square feet, what range of of architecture and engineering cost would you think reasonable?
Hey mattmccormick5050, the following topics might be helpful:
More suggestions...
I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.
There is a lot that goes into this. I'm not understanding the 3% of construction cost vs 8% of the total project cost. Your total project cost would include construction cost and therefore should be a smaller percentage compared to construction hard cost, correct?
3
Correct. I am just referring to the wide range of costs that I read about [ranging all the way from 3% of hard cost (min) up to 8% of total cost(max)].
P.S. Can you tell by my bracketing that I am more of a financial modeler than a developer :)
The range is wide because MFR design is repetitive. Going from 50 units to 150 does not mean tripling the number of unit types. You'll find the lowest design % of construction cost on projects with hundreds of units.
So I have done little MF work personally. I had a project in ATL for about 20 units or so and I quoted them about $3.50 sf for Architecture and MEP. Structural, Civil, and any other designer fee such as Landscape were priced separately. I could have possibly priced the Structural fees, but the Civil was very dependant on the site - and that particular site had a bunch of challenges.
I mostly work on government commercial projects where there is not a bunch of repetitive work like a MF, and our prices are stiffer. Depending on the size/complexity, the A/E fees we charge are roughly 6%-9% of the Construction Cost.
In your scenario what is your estimated construction cost? I see you estimated a total project cost of 10-15 mil.
$3.50 psf is a lot less for Architecture and MEP than what I had expected. This MF would be a lot simpler than government commercial projects, although it would involve building on top of a parking podium (probably three floors of Type V residential over concrete podium). Here is my full budget for 25 units across 24,000 sf gross / 19,800 sf net residential on a 9,000 sf site. Currently budgeting $6.25 psf for engineering (2.4% of hard cost) and $15.83 psf for architecture (6% of hard cost).
Ok so building on top of a parking podium would add to the complexity variable we would use to calculate fee.
$3.50 is looking at a site relatively flat with ground up new construction.
If we calculated it at even $5 psf using 30,000 sf we would get an AE fee of $150,000.00... I then add 20% (10% overhead, and 10% profit) now we are $180,000. Architect gets 60-65% of the fee the MEP gets 35-40%. We then contract out other fees.
If we thought the job was a bit more speculative we could find a medium between calculating per the Per SF method above and calculating a fee based on Construction hard cost. Just roughly without knowing the project too much @30,000 SF we estimate residential Type V construction @$200 SF so our in house projected construction cost would be $6,000,000. Then like I said above, we would look somewhere between 6%-9%, let's use 7.5%. Our estimated A/E fee would be $450,000. A/E with 292,500 MEP with $157,500. This is closer to the scenario you present.
This is a $270,000 difference that we are aware of while we would like to get as close to the $450,000 fee as possible it largely depends on the available funds for the project. A developer is more inclined to negotiate for a per SF project or a per unit in an effort to control cost. A city or state may have the budget for the project for years with an expected 6%-9% A/E fee along with other common fees gathered through historical data. Our decision will largely depend on the competitive nature of the market and the office work on hand; that $180,000 still has a 10% profit and will help pay salaries until another opportunity presents itself.
Oh and for anyone questioning what's the difference between receiving the $180,000 or $450,000 if the same building is going to be built, well in short, a responsible Architect will give you a better project. More time in the office can be dedicated to the project and more senior personnel can work directly on it. They will hire "better" engineers; or even you can hire a "better", more familiar architect. Additional specialty consultants can be hired to help with the review process and any potential problems during entitlement/or permitting. Construction Administration can now afford to have 1 or 2 folks more involved on-site through the construction process. Overall design time and revisions should be reduced; saving the Developer money.
For our projects we typically underwrite 3% for arch and 1.6% for civil/struct and 1.6% for MEP (all based on hard costs). Most of our A/E consultants quote us on that basis as well. Hope this helps!
Thanks AM Guru, that is certainly helpful. That is lighter on the architecture and heavier on the engineering that I would have otherwise budgeted.
You say "there is a lot that goes into this." I am planning on doing three floors of residential above a parking podium (24K to 40K sf of residential total). Does $75psf for the parking podium and $210psf gross for the residential sound reasonable? And would the 3% for arch and 3.2% for engineering hold up given this type of design?
Aut dolore sint est nam qui. Ex laborum architecto corrupti repudiandae voluptatem. Ut voluptatibus corrupti quo explicabo deleniti et voluptatum molestiae. Nam optio illum molestiae voluptatibus nobis ut quasi dicta.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...