Dartmouth Partners Interview Shitshow Help

I am currently in an interview process for a PE summer internship, the recruiting for which was outsourced Dartmouth Partners. I am an undergrad. The firm is not one I care to be at so I'm really just meandering along the process. I know that these guys are supposed to be pretty well known and do associate PE recruiting and the like. I've just had a really bad experience with them so far. The interviewer has sent me like 10 different (incorrectly timed) calendar invites in the past 5 days even though I already scheduled my interview with them through one of those calendar websites for a specific time. When I have contacted them to communicate with them directly about these issues, they have either ghosted me, gotten back to me extremely late, and/or acknowledged my problem and then repeatedly sent me the invite I just told them was incorrect. Today, literally when I was asleep, they changed my interview time from next week to today, and also changed my interview medium (from zoom to teams) or something like that. Obviously, I was asleep and I didn't notice. Then 10 minutes into my interview I got a call and an email to my personal email (which I don't even know how they found) asking where the fuck I was. I was still asleep at this point so I obviously didn't notice the call. When I woke up, I saw the email, told them that we had scheduled our interview for next week, and still have not received a reply from. At this point, I'm just sick and tired, and don't even want to interview with them anymore. What they've done to me so far is extremely irresponsible and preprofessional. The sad part is that the interviewer is 5 years into his job at Dartmouth, not a fucking intern.


I know that headhunters are extremely picky about candidates and they will not look at you twice if you don't do well in their process the first time. Does this extend to undergrads and outsourced recruiting? Am I effectively blacklisted from Dartmouth Partners and subsequently the firms that use them to recruit because of this bad experience (which may be blamed on me)? Finally, I am an American student and looking to stay in the United States. If I do get blacklisted, does it even matter because they seem (from my WSO research) to be a UK-based firm. So am I fucked or am I fine. Are there any funds that use Dartmouth in the US?

 

You're based in the US correct?

Dartmouth is primarily used in the UK, and they are known to be quite shit. I doubt you'd be blacklisted and even if you are, you could bypass that by a referral if in the US or explaining the situation to a senior at Dartmouth if it really is that important. Dont stress about this though - you did nothing wrong.

 

Same here. I get scheduled for two interviews, go to the first one and no one shows up, then I go to the second one and they say I was already interviewed.

 

Went through Dartmouth before, recruited into a equity type position at a fund, turned out it was a quant role and when I got into the 2nd interview he and I were confused how I even got past the recruiter interviewing role.

 

Some of the people interviewing for DP are fresh grads with humanities degrees with no idea about any finance terminology. Truly embarrassing firm.

 

Horrible experience with them as well. Was contacted by them on LinkedIn where they suggested I should apply for an internship at a major US PE fund in London. Only problem was that the link didn't work and of course neither the recruiter or their support team replied. Haven't had much better experiences with other recruiters though. A recruiter from Blackwood reached out to me asking to set up a call regarding an opportunity at a large-cap US tech fund in the UK. I replied that I was highly interested and said I was free at any time that suited her. No response after that...

I think that there is a problem in general with the entire industry though. HR departments at banks are also absolutely horrible. Terrible communication and always messing up details such as interview times, what position you applied for, what period you are interested in etc. I don't understand how they can even manage to mess these things up as you always have to state them clearly in the application or via email. Pisses me off when people are unable to handle their jobs, especially when it's a really simple job that doesn't really require a ton of brain power to get it right. 

 

Horrible experience with them as well. Was contacted by them on LinkedIn where they suggested I should apply for an internship at a major US PE fund in London. Only problem was that the link didn't work and of course neither the recruiter or their support team replied. Haven't had much better experiences with other recruiters though. A recruiter from Blackwood reached out to me asking to set up a call regarding an opportunity at a large-cap US tech fund in the UK. I replied that I was highly interested and said I was free at any time that suited her. No response after that...

I think that there is a problem in general with the entire industry though. HR departments at banks are also absolutely horrible. Terrible communication and always messing up details such as interview times, what position you applied for, what period you are interested in etc. I don't understand how they can even manage to mess these things up as you always have to state them clearly in the application or via email. Pisses me off when people are unable to handle their jobs, especially when it's a really simple job that doesn't really require a ton of brain power to get it right. 

Makes sense though, right? Doesn’t matter how bad the candidate experience is for recruiting, people will still apply to firms like PWP and will still have to go through Dartmouth if that’s who they have chosen to outsource their HR function to.

 

You're right, most people will still apply. However, as soon as people get options that might no longer hold true. Let's say you've already got an offer from one place but you are also recruiting for another place which is just slightly better. If that recruitment process is a real mess then you might just say fk it, I don't have the energy for this. As such, the candidates with no options will remain interested no matter how messed up the recruitment process is. Meanwhile, the ones that are most likely to say fk it are the ones with options and these are often the more attractive candidates. 

I had a horrible experience some time ago. Was recruiting for an internship in IB and it was a really long process. After application, tests, video interview, and 3 interviews I finally get the offer. Only problem is that they have messed up the periods. They thought I wanted an internship during the fall when I wanted one during the spring. I ask them how they got that idea since I filled in that I was only available during the spring in the application and clearly stated it in all three interviews. It must have been an misunderstanding they said. If they had known I wanted the period during the spring before, it wouldn't have been any issues as they really liked my profile but the spring off-cycle spots were filled a couple of days ago. I will never recruit for that bank again after that experience and when friends ask me about the process I tell them that same story. When HR messes up on a large scale it can have a quite negative impact on the pipeline of candidates and reputation for a firm. 

 

Iste et neque debitis qui reprehenderit. Illum nesciunt porro dolores et magni quae officia. Nam sed saepe et molestiae minima libero eos. Soluta sed quo quia aut.

Eius quia enim autem perferendis quibusdam repudiandae perferendis. Assumenda in rerum perspiciatis dolore eligendi porro voluptates odit.

Quo saepe et excepturi at et iste quasi sed. Magni possimus optio reprehenderit nobis necessitatibus sint. Nisi et veniam accusantium similique recusandae eius. Ex necessitatibus distinctio nihil labore vel. Porro tempore consequatur ipsam aperiam aut.

 
Most Helpful

Ducimus voluptas voluptas quaerat harum saepe nobis libero quidem. Voluptas sunt nulla molestias vitae sint. Ipsa quia laudantium necessitatibus eius quidem qui est.

Nostrum consequatur deleniti eaque. Quae id inventore repellat eum. Ratione beatae eos aut rerum laudantium nostrum laborum ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”