MF PE offer vs Startup BizOps/Strategy Role
Currently an analyst in a top group (PJT RSSG/GS TMT) who likes banking but does not want to stay in finance long term and has more of an interest in startups/entrepreneurship.
Received a off-cycle MF PE offer but also a BizOps/Strategy role at a rapidly growing Series A startup.
Obviously, comp is no comparison but if I want to do entrepreneurship in the future which will set me up better in the long run. I cant help but feel that these startup opportunities will always come but I have 1 shot to do MF PE to get that stamp on my resume. Am I thinking about this wrong?
Bump
This is completely true, does not deserve a downvote. Will also give you more capital for initial bootstrap and lessen the career risk you’d take as a founder
If the role is strategic finance, I can provide more color as someone at a larger start up around day to day, if that is informative.
Think MF PE is the move though.
Not OP but would be super interested in this.
Definitely:
-Extensive modeling (detailed rev modeling, OpEx forecasting, 3 statement projections)
-Deck building for investors, BoD, senior management
-Working on strategic initiatives (Driving go to mkt strategy, mkt sizing, pricing strategy)
-Ad Hoc projects w/ dept heads (ie: understanding drivers resulting in operational shortcomings and working cross functionally to put together strategies to alleviate these shortcomings)
-Not really a day to day but something I do is staying up to date with industry trends, finding available equity research to inform forecasting assumptions, public comp earnings calls
Would also be very interested in this. Also, how much of a pay cut did you take going to strategy?
Definitely:
-Extensive modeling (detailed rev modeling, OpEx forecasting, 3 statement projections)
-Deck building for investors, BoD, senior management
-Working on strategic initiatives (Driving go to mkt strategy, mkt sizing, pricing strategy)
-Ad Hoc projects w/ dept heads (ie: understanding drivers resulting in operational shortcomings and working cross functionally to put together strategies to alleviate these shortcomings)
-Not really a day to day but something I do is staying up to date with industry trends, finding available equity research to inform forecasting assumptions, public comp earnings calls
Also, just lucked into strat fin right out of UG so never did banking. Base of 90k and no equity at this point - think we may be considered too big for juniors to get equity which really sucks for sure.
Following.
IMO, if you have the broad platform of the GS name and exposure to tech, I don’t know how much another top finance role will help in your startup career.
If this is a PJT RSSG -> KKR Tech, it might be beneficial (broader network and tech experience).
MF PE and don't look back. If (when) you want to go into startup you will have all the opportunities in the world.
Source: Myself - currently a second year associate at a MF searching for a corporate dev/strategy role and getting everything from Series A to F100
Thanks for the great advice, a couple questions that I have. Are the roles that you are getting mostly CorpDev/Strategy but more so financial analysis and finance related (internal M&A)? Are these roles operational or related to growth initiatives at all (BizOps)? Are you working under the CFO or COO?
Would love some color on this, would hate to be bucketed as the "finance guy" as I feel that strategy and operations experience is more transferrable to when I go down the route of entrepreneurship.
I think it depends on a couple factors broadly bucketed into 1) experience 2) preference 3) company size
1) Experience - While a lot of your experience during MFPE is underwriting I've seen a couple of my friends at different funds spend a lot of times (due to shit FP&A) functions with the portco and really gain good operational experience during their 2-3 years as an associate. Some have enjoyed it and are able to leverage their experience to go into more BizOps/Strategy role
2) Preference - To your question, after 2+2 (IB+PE) you'll generally have a lot of opportunities for corp dev/strategy roles (internal M&A) and many associates enjoy the work but want better WLB hence the move into corp dev/strat. However, tying to point #1 those who like the more operational/entrepreneurial side there is certainly roles available which ties to #3
3) Company Size - Smaller companies (Series A-C) are willing to offer 'higher' title roles and responsibilities to entice individuals to compete with larger corporates (i.e. F100) whereas F100 probably won't be giving a 2+2 individual Director/VP level roles so it really depends on the size you're targeting. If you're looking at Series A-C (though I'd probably focus on the absolute size of the company in-terms of revenue/employee count) you'll probably be reporting directly to the CFO (as a director/VP) whereas if you go to a F100 you'll probably go in as a manager/sr. manager which is 2-3 bands apart from CFO
Hope this is helpful
Tldr; Exit opps depends on your preference and experience but you aren't just pigeonholed into 'finance' type roles
The key IMO is that you enjoy banking. In that case, you’re likely to enjoy MFPE while also getting all the value of that experience for longer term career options.
I feel dirty saying this, but I'm leaning MF PE... and this is coming from someone who left PE for startup life and generally shits on PE. It's a 2-3 year role, your bank acct will thank you, and I do think the startup roles will probably always be there. You can always leave for a startup at the end of that stint and have a fat wallet instead of going to b school (or go to b school anyway and dick around for a few years).
But just get comfortable with the fact that life probably will suck for a bit longer, and make peace with the fact that the startup may hit it out of the park (probably not though).
Realistically you're probably fine career-wise either way (if you're smart enough to get a MF PE offer, you're likely smart enough to figure it out regardless of path chosen). I do find it a bit curious that you recruited for 2 very different paths though.
I also made switch from PE to startup and I agree with this. Take the MF PE offer, a StratFin Series A seat will always be there for you after PE (but definitely not the other way around). Worst case stay a year only and then leave if you absolutely hate it.
Does the same logic apply for late stage VC / growth rather than PE?
1 - Do not ever put the likes of PJT with a low-tier IB like GS ever again. PJT/CVP/Rothschild >>> LAZ/Greenhill >>>>>>>> All else.
2 - The specific PE MF matters. Since some people apparently think TPG/Warburg/Carlyle are MFs, let me clarify. I would prefer death to working there. APO/KKR is a no brainer, BX and below is instant no. But all of these are leagues and bounds above working at a filthy startup. What are you, a tech bro?
I work at a high growth VC backed startup (on the engineering side). It’s super fun, great people, I like seeing the revenue growth and hiring growth, but there’s plenty of companies that are similar out there. There will continue to be high growth startups and you really shouldn’t count on equity always being the likes of Uber/ Airbnb/ etc no matter how successful the team is. There’s always inherent risk (even at large firms).
Imo I think you could lateral more easily than you’d imagine into the startup world now and later, whereas I’m not so sure that’s the case with the PE firm you’re considering.
Love these humble brag posts, but since you post anonymously I never understand what the OP gets out of them.
MF PE. You have only time in your life you can do this. You can join a startup anytime in your life.
how'd you receive an off cycle PE offer?
you are def at GS TMT
Ut suscipit dolorum assumenda nobis expedita. Ratione repellat aut omnis. Ipsam occaecati blanditiis assumenda et et omnis. Iste necessitatibus debitis reprehenderit velit occaecati nihil. Qui asperiores delectus excepturi impedit ea. Officiis cumque nihil voluptatem quis est consequuntur ullam.
Soluta sit quia sit ipsa voluptas impedit. Sunt qui quam praesentium eaque quidem. Quia sit quaerat officiis ut officiis cupiditate rem id. Libero tenetur iste eos ipsum.
Sunt deserunt sequi vitae. Et facere quam dicta nostrum laboriosam. Aut ut quo reprehenderit dolor. Quidem ipsam a minus ex quis corporis voluptatibus.
Fuga eum voluptas id officiis. Repellat fugiat ex deleniti enim nihil et cum. Quo nihil in earum officia. Sint ut ut quo voluptatibus aut et. Quaerat praesentium et et culpa pariatur. Sint velit sapiente exercitationem. Aut quo qui sit rerum molestiae alias a.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Ad tenetur provident rerum corporis quo. Debitis neque iusto explicabo nihil ut deleniti unde. Libero ab praesentium esse error. Consequatur quia eum vitae ut id tempora quos. Impedit ullam laborum nemo est qui. Fugiat voluptas vel molestias ipsa sequi delectus.
Eius et blanditiis doloribus earum non et. Distinctio porro officia beatae recusandae.
Sed est nisi unde voluptates tempore. Ut dolore eum eligendi sunt iure accusamus quia.
Explicabo maxime temporibus natus ut delectus veniam ea tempore. Accusantium quam delectus quia iure omnis ducimus asperiores. Magnam odit esse dolorem corrupti et error. Autem autem corporis et sint perferendis. Sit omnis laborum earum deleniti adipisci.