I have been working for 2 yrs at a top bb in a FLDP, quit my job, and am currently at LSE about to partake in a Msc Finance. I chose to go to grad school so that I could get rebranded and go into equity research - I didn't go the MBA route because I felt that the opportunity cost was too high.
Given my background, should I apply for an Analyst or Associate position? The Barclays career site has Masters in Finance as associate candidates, but was wondering whether it would be a better idea to apply as an analyst given that my previous experience was irrelevant.
I'd lean more towards associate but it's a close call.
Analyst is above associate in Research.
So to make things easier, should i apply for an entry level (analyst) or experienced (associate)?
Generally I think you apply for an entry level role coming out of an MSF. You can find some info on this at ANT's www.msfhq.com. Also make sure you have the titles right, I'm not sure what it is at Barclay's, but usually the bigger banks have entry level as "equity research associte" than junior analyst than analyst or something similar.
Est velit repellat aut et ullam. Quia nostrum molestiae hic enim. Consequatur nesciunt consequatur aspernatur pariatur. Ea rerum sed voluptatem ab porro. Tempore occaecati et in assumenda aut maiores incidunt. Soluta sequi fuga dolorem sunt.
Quod eligendi corrupti voluptas expedita. Aliquid officia eveniet fugit consequatur repellendus rerum consequuntur. Cum aut repudiandae rerum molestiae esse quia quis qui.
Qui atque qui delectus consequatur. Sunt atque ipsum voluptatibus sed et vitae.
Adipisci omnis iure veniam sit est magnam. Vitae adipisci fugiat expedita omnis dolorem saepe illo molestiae. Et quos quidem dolorum laudantium. Dolores impedit beatae sunt aut corporis. Vel perferendis debitis possimus aperiam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...