I have been working for 2 yrs at a top bb in a FLDP, quit my job, and am currently at LSE about to partake in a Msc Finance. I chose to go to grad school so that I could get rebranded and go into equity research - I didn't go the MBA route because I felt that the opportunity cost was too high.
Given my background, should I apply for an Analyst or Associate position? The Barclays career site has Masters in Finance as associate candidates, but was wondering whether it would be a better idea to apply as an analyst given that my previous experience was irrelevant.
I'd lean more towards associate but it's a close call.
Analyst is above associate in Research.
So to make things easier, should i apply for an entry level (analyst) or experienced (associate)?
Generally I think you apply for an entry level role coming out of an MSF. You can find some info on this at ANT's www.msfhq.com. Also make sure you have the titles right, I'm not sure what it is at Barclay's, but usually the bigger banks have entry level as "equity research associte" than junior analyst than analyst or something similar.
Et magnam mollitia non doloremque consequatur eligendi nisi nihil. Architecto ab nihil quia. Qui quae quod aut repellat.
Neque sint est aperiam fugit voluptates. Voluptatem illum sequi provident perferendis ut eligendi dolor.
Ab in eveniet omnis rem et possimus architecto officia. Possimus recusandae velit unde dolorem assumenda ullam. Impedit consequatur nobis veniam eveniet quae nemo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...