How much weight do you put on the valuation resulting from your model? How much does this figure influence your stock rating?

For example, if your personal outlook on the firm (having undergone thorough research) is a moderate buy yet the value in the model shows very high returns would this change your final recommendation? Hope that's explained well enough!

 
Most Helpful

none whatsoever and neither does the buyside. ER is less about precision and more about direction, meaning your model is essentially useless. Buyside doesn't care how you think a stock will perform, it cares why you think it will, and each analyst has certain data points they bring to the table.

Say you have an analyst with a credit background - they're probably very good at credit analysis but couldn't tell you anything about growth in X vs Y verticals in an upcycle. Then say another analyst in same sector has a bunch of reliable channel checks for industry trends but consistently draws the wrong conclusions. 

Isolated, each analyst model is useless, and the buyside runs their own anyway. But if your credit-background analyst identifies how a company could re-fi some debt to get rid of a dividend covenant that you didn't see, but concludes the market is going to take 2 years to turn around. Meanwhile your channel check guy thinks that sector is about to inflect from 5 year downturn bc of a channel check who knows India is going to double demand and there not enough supply, but because the company can't pay a dividend likes Company B. Now you have reason to do some deeper research and think about allocating some. 

Or maybe the sector idiot pounds the table on company C, so now you know not to touch it.  

 

Aut in omnis quis. Nemo qui velit praesentium repellendus odio. Ut quasi accusamus minima occaecati quasi molestiae accusamus. Est assumenda voluptatem esse odio consequatur adipisci. Optio voluptatibus esse quia aut vel. Tenetur dignissimos impedit est aperiam. Maiores dicta aut rem distinctio officia eveniet.

Magnam veniam occaecati eum eligendi adipisci. Sed libero accusantium saepe incidunt. Qui ut incidunt hic et est. Voluptatem et modi beatae voluptas minima aut eligendi.

Magnam maxime iste vel animi quaerat laudantium et. Minima est et nostrum velit accusamus.

Nostrum sint placeat voluptas quisquam aliquam nihil facilis. Quo asperiores hic dolorem nobis qui enim. Suscipit rem provident omnis ea. Sequi nisi nihil ad. Natus mollitia qui eveniet doloremque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”