Deriving a PT from FCF yield

Hey there, I think I'm missing something basic here. I'm familiar with deriving a price target for a stock based on things like EBITDA multiples, but I've seen people say things like "At $N EBITDA and a X% fcf yield, the implied price is $Y/sh for a Z% upside." What is the math there for deriving a price target based on the fcf yield?

 

If EBITDA = Cashflow, not uncommon for software companies for example, then a $10M EBITDA company and a 12.5% FCF yeild would imply a 8x FCF multiple, so $10M x 8x = 80M EV + netcash = Market value

 
Best Response

Ok so it's not anything technical or arithmetically oriented, as I understand your question.

If you see a sell-side report from JP Morgan, or something mimicking that, certain industries will trade more upon EBITDA multiples or free cash flow multiples (or "yields", 1/multiple) than others. Maybe every industry should trade on EBITDA or cash flow multiples. It is certainly relevant, in my experience particularly the cash flow part.

But it most common for EPS to dominate the valuation discussion even in this age of non-GAAP numbers. So analysts will decide upon a PE multiple based on peer companies and the relative growth rates. It is the same process using EBITDA or operating cash flow or free cash flow.

Using PE vs. EV/EBITDA or P/FCF should produce similar results in most cases. Companies with high debt levels will rank less favorably on EV/EBITDA. Companies with heavy capital investments will rank less favorably on P/FCF. Companies with extensive non-GAAP adjustments may rank less favorably on cash flow metrics.

Bottom line there is no science to the valuation metrics that investors deem most relevant. I would say that cash flow always, always, always wins in the end.

 

Iure dolorem alias voluptate veritatis sit omnis. Repellat ut ipsam officiis cumque eum explicabo. Et rerum possimus dicta dolores modi.

Facilis illum rerum in deleniti. Voluptas aperiam exercitationem perferendis neque dignissimos eum accusamus. Vel eum maiores molestiae cupiditate dolores autem odio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (25) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (227) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (23) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (253) $90
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”