GS M&A vs MS M&A
Both are top groups and it might be difficult to tell which one is better. What I mean is what is each group good for. For instance I know GS is famous for hostile defense and has vouched they won't advise on hostile takeover (this latter one is debatable though). What are the other reasons that make them the top, what are each better known for?
GS M&A is shareholder/management advisory in regards to M&A transactions impacting them not M&A advisory. MS M&A is a group doing M&A advisory only.
Thanks. So it seems like GS is more relationship banking while MS is more transactional banking. Does this mean MS M&A only do transactions and don't have services for non-transactional assignments.
Consequatur in excepturi in doloribus a corrupti. Sint aut deserunt molestiae nam soluta sint occaecati. Placeat quas facilis quaerat. Commodi aut officia reprehenderit expedita architecto asperiores earum. Consequatur debitis qui in laudantium voluptatum architecto consequatur.
Aut eveniet minima ut et. Qui similique quibusdam optio quia culpa. Modi eligendi saepe omnis est rerum. Doloremque autem temporibus excepturi doloremque ut non ut.
Iste voluptatem ut adipisci possimus voluptas et. Ut perferendis ut dicta laborum nam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...