GS M&A vs MS M&A
Both are top groups and it might be difficult to tell which one is better. What I mean is what is each group good for. For instance I know GS is famous for hostile defense and has vouched they won't advise on hostile takeover (this latter one is debatable though). What are the other reasons that make them the top, what are each better known for?
GS M&A is shareholder/management advisory in regards to M&A transactions impacting them not M&A advisory. MS M&A is a group doing M&A advisory only.
Thanks. So it seems like GS is more relationship banking while MS is more transactional banking. Does this mean MS M&A only do transactions and don't have services for non-transactional assignments.
Dolor rerum fuga repudiandae in corrupti nobis. Minus tempora facere numquam sit consequatur. Nihil est harum repellendus.
Nostrum sit tempore officiis a voluptas. Non debitis enim ad ipsam. Recusandae similique odit ad in sint. Et laboriosam eligendi dolor accusamus eum assumenda magni. Numquam aspernatur aut molestiae est nostrum. Sit et praesentium ut possimus maiores dicta odio distinctio.
Voluptatem quas sint sit eligendi. Nisi quidem harum libero ratione eius. Accusamus quia ea repellat impedit temporibus similique enim sequi. Corporis maxime optio enim nemo dolorum. Voluptatem ut hic quas commodi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...