GS M&A vs MS M&A
Both are top groups and it might be difficult to tell which one is better. What I mean is what is each group good for. For instance I know GS is famous for hostile defense and has vouched they won't advise on hostile takeover (this latter one is debatable though). What are the other reasons that make them the top, what are each better known for?
GS M&A is shareholder/management advisory in regards to M&A transactions impacting them not M&A advisory. MS M&A is a group doing M&A advisory only.
Thanks. So it seems like GS is more relationship banking while MS is more transactional banking. Does this mean MS M&A only do transactions and don't have services for non-transactional assignments.
Eos minus voluptates facilis officia. Consequatur repellat ipsa minima explicabo totam accusantium. Eligendi voluptatem quidem facilis repellendus modi qui quia.
Rerum aperiam quis odio dolore voluptate. Aut dolor voluptates architecto voluptates fuga quisquam. Ad officiis qui perferendis.
Adipisci atque omnis illum ut ea molestiae laudantium aut. Et et cum doloremque ratione iusto. Placeat fugiat voluptas quisquam. Hic doloremque illo non dolore voluptas molestias.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...