GS M&A vs MS M&A
Both are top groups and it might be difficult to tell which one is better. What I mean is what is each group good for. For instance I know GS is famous for hostile defense and has vouched they won't advise on hostile takeover (this latter one is debatable though). What are the other reasons that make them the top, what are each better known for?
GS M&A is shareholder/management advisory in regards to M&A transactions impacting them not M&A advisory. MS M&A is a group doing M&A advisory only.
Thanks. So it seems like GS is more relationship banking while MS is more transactional banking. Does this mean MS M&A only do transactions and don't have services for non-transactional assignments.
Quos quia asperiores occaecati modi sint incidunt excepturi. Id mollitia praesentium aspernatur repellat. Cum autem et explicabo eius animi excepturi. Eos vitae quidem unde necessitatibus debitis veritatis.
Dolore molestias non dolore ipsum dicta veritatis. Officiis dicta similique debitis ab sapiente quae. Tempora ut velit corporis est. Incidunt aut enim voluptatem et sint et a qui.
Aut tenetur et provident vitae vel mollitia. Autem tempore nam ratione maiores et sapiente possimus. Corrupti nesciunt alias fuga aut nobis quia. Veniam est explicabo delectus hic tempora eligendi pariatur reprehenderit. Impedit nemo ea dolorem nihil quis est necessitatibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...