GP Stake Modeling

Hi all,

Does anyone have any experience modeling GP stake investments in PE firms? I understand the basics when it comes to the businesses themselves and the general inputs/assumptions around a 2 and 20 fee structure tied to AUM, etc. and from what I've read it seems most use a DCF with some waterfall to project hurdles for GP/LP split. Where I get lost is in attempting to model AUM over time with distributions, J-curves, and other macro factors. Would greatly appreciate any insight.


 

Ah, diving into the world of GP stake investments, are we? It's quite the jungle out there, but fear not, I've got some insights that might help you navigate through the thickets of this complex terrain, based on the most helpful WSO content.

First off, you're on the right track understanding the basics around the 2 and 20 fee structure and the use of DCF models. These are indeed foundational elements when modeling GP stake investments. Now, let's tackle the areas where you're seeking clarity:

  1. Modeling AUM Over Time: This can indeed be tricky due to the dynamic nature of investments and the market. A common approach is to use historical growth rates as a base and adjust for expected changes in the market environment and the firm's competitive position. Consider factors such as the firm's track record, market trends, and potential for new fund launches. It's also wise to model different scenarios (e.g., base, optimistic, pessimistic) to understand the range of possible outcomes.

  2. Incorporating Distributions and J-Curves: The J-curve effect, where initial negative returns are followed by a period of positive returns, is crucial in PE modeling. You can model this by estimating the timing and size of initial investments, expected holding periods, and exit timings. For distributions, consider the fund's distribution policy and historical payout patterns. It's common to model distributions as a percentage of realized gains after a certain period.

  3. Accounting for Macro Factors: Macro factors can significantly impact AUM growth and investment returns. Incorporate assumptions about economic growth, interest rates, and industry-specific trends into your model. Sensitivity analysis can be particularly useful here to understand how changes in these factors could impact your projections.

  4. Waterfall Structures for GP/LP Split: The GP/LP split is often determined by a waterfall structure based on achieving certain return hurdles. Modeling this requires a detailed understanding of the fund's terms and conditions. Start by clearly defining the hurdles and then model the cash flows to both GP and LPs based on these conditions. Excel's IF and MIN functions can be quite handy for this purpose.

Remember, modeling GP stake investments is as much an art as it is a science. It requires a blend of quantitative analysis and qualitative judgment. Don't hesitate to leverage industry reports, consult with peers, and even reach out to professionals in the field for insights. The WSO forums are a great place to connect with others who might have gone through the same journey.

And remember, every model is a simplification of reality. The goal is to capture the key drivers of value while acknowledging the inherent uncertainties. Keep refining your model as you gain more insights and data. Happy modeling!

Sources: GP Stakes Modelling, GP Stakes Modelling/Metrics, Questions about Growth Equity Private Equity, Does anyone have any experience covering banks at a 2a-7 fund?, Anyone has experience starting a hedge fund?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Dolores ipsa adipisci facere. Et sapiente iusto facere. Consequuntur non id praesentium qui ipsam fuga distinctio. Aut qui doloribus non.

Vero commodi nemo temporibus illum est neque rem. Commodi velit enim vel debitis. Reiciendis et sed non repudiandae. In commodi velit illo. Provident ipsum ea incidunt. Aut eligendi quia rerum nihil ea ut voluptates sequi. Possimus nisi deleniti quas soluta voluptatibus vel.

Dolorum iusto nesciunt sit nihil. Aut est officiis recusandae praesentium cupiditate. Rerum consequatur voluptatem et fugit. Necessitatibus occaecati dolores dolorum. Amet voluptatem quia ipsum rerum consequatur facere nobis nisi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”