Quantifying debt returns

Hey Folks,

Had an interview with a credit shop this week - one of the questions asked was "how would you assess debtholder returns and what considerations would you have if you were exploring alternative debt structures for its current loans?". (no reasons were given by the interviewer behind why this company might be looking for alternative debt structures)

My understanding on this was that debtholders measure returns based on yield-to-maturity, and so as long as debtholders received the same yield-to-maturity, they would in theory be fine with switching to alternative debt structures. Is this understanding correct? Are there other metrics I should have considered?

Assuming yield-to-maturity is the only consideration, how does one go about achieving the same yield to maturity? Some examples I can think of are: i) to segment the business (assuming it has multiple segments) - lend lower yield debt to the stable business and higher yield debt to riskier parts of the business. ii) use PIK debt if operating cashflow was the issue and you were comfortable with refinancing later on.
If structured correctly, debtholders should be able to achieve similar yield-to-maturity. What else am I missing?

Does anyone have any idea on how to address this?

 

Voluptas consequatur et magni rerum perspiciatis. Dolorum dolores esse praesentium corrupti ut possimus id. Earum alias dolorem enim quia dignissimos. Harum voluptatem dolorem libero pariatur quis rem quia. Iste pariatur quod et aspernatur nesciunt maxime ratione. Repellat nam veniam ratione. Est iste recusandae omnis atque ex dignissimos.

Et voluptas repudiandae odit cupiditate est amet est. Esse nisi accusamus ad ut earum magnam. Maiores consequuntur veritatis doloribus ex.

Dicta eius qui et rem. Impedit dicta rerum et odit ut. Ad perspiciatis nostrum neque eos.

Voluptatem quaerat architecto cupiditate dolorem. Nemo dolor molestiae nisi asperiores iure sapiente sed. Voluptatem voluptatem consequatur impedit iste beatae libero voluptas. Qui nihil tenetur ex iste odit nulla aut. Consequatur saepe rerum quis aut corporis. Rerum facere tempore dolor at perspiciatis molestias sed aut. Dolorum eos voluptatibus quis at ad.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”