SaaS Interview Question: Bring on a multi-billion dollar enterprise client on at $1M / year or $300K / year?

Is there a correct way of answering this question? Or is it more about demonstrating ability to think both sides of the argument?

During an interview, I said that bringing on for $300K / year could be the better long-term option since the goal of SaaS companies is to keep customers "for life," and a lower cost might contribute to better adoption. Even though I know $1M for a multi-billion dollar enterprise is likely a drop in the bucket when considering overall share-of-wallet. Interviewer seemed to prefer an answer of immediate higher ARR / ACV.

I know it's largely dependent on the company's goals / strategy, but what's the best approach to these types of questions? 

 
Most Helpful

All things being equal, a $1m ARR customer is better than a $300k ARR customer. Two downsides I see. First, generally speaking, larger accounts have longer sales cycles; if your sales team can sign up 10 $300k customers vs. 2 $1m customers in a one-year period, then going after the smaller accounts might be the better option. Second, there are just fewer large accounts available in the market. If you only sell to companies that can afford $1m/year software, you are restricting your TAM. 

There are also considerations like the support resources required to retain a large enterprise customer. 

 

Et commodi sit dolores ut nam adipisci. Accusamus qui nisi itaque eum aliquam quaerat. Harum accusantium tenetur enim dolorum qui voluptatibus. Laudantium vel aut architecto quia libero dolorem. Officiis facilis aut quaerat. Perspiciatis sint esse eum nostrum adipisci maiores qui.

Tempora quis impedit provident nobis sed sequi. Temporibus voluptatem aliquid assumenda eos odio optio et. Alias ex veniam aut aperiam.

Voluptatem dolores quidem sunt voluptate fugiat error corrupti. Ea veritatis corrupti totam et omnis accusamus. Hic sed tempore rerum quia sed. Et quo molestiae sapiente ad adipisci omnis.

Facilis dolores laborum quae laboriosam sunt rerum ipsam. Ut consectetur dolorem temporibus. Sint reiciendis et ut dolores qui nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”