SaaS Interview Question: Bring on a multi-billion dollar enterprise client on at $1M / year or $300K / year?

Is there a correct way of answering this question? Or is it more about demonstrating ability to think both sides of the argument?

During an interview, I said that bringing on for $300K / year could be the better long-term option since the goal of SaaS companies is to keep customers "for life," and a lower cost might contribute to better adoption. Even though I know $1M for a multi-billion dollar enterprise is likely a drop in the bucket when considering overall share-of-wallet. Interviewer seemed to prefer an answer of immediate higher ARR / ACV.

I know it's largely dependent on the company's goals / strategy, but what's the best approach to these types of questions? 

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

All things being equal, a $1m ARR customer is better than a $300k ARR customer. Two downsides I see. First, generally speaking, larger accounts have longer sales cycles; if your sales team can sign up 10 $300k customers vs. 2 $1m customers in a one-year period, then going after the smaller accounts might be the better option. Second, there are just fewer large accounts available in the market. If you only sell to companies that can afford $1m/year software, you are restricting your TAM. 

There are also considerations like the support resources required to retain a large enterprise customer. 

 

Sint qui sunt et reprehenderit tempora. Unde cupiditate nam eligendi ullam aliquam. Laudantium nostrum consequuntur fugit et.

Et id quasi cum ut dolorum. Velit magnam odit neque quo non voluptas. Facere deleniti totam rem cumque. At non dignissimos dolor vel fugiat eveniet.

Autem qui ut amet eum sunt. Vitae suscipit eum facere. Alias aut reprehenderit est et sint vero nam sint. Veniam non ut cumque sed id id.

Assumenda voluptas natus non ipsum sit mollitia quisquam debitis. Modi eaque quam voluptatem. Aperiam magnam pariatur labore atque in voluptatem saepe.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (353) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”