This is interesting -
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703…
In view of this -
(Larry Summers had criticisized SWFs in 2007)
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/bb8f50b8-3dcc-11dc-8f6a-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1IIOz44dh
Especially the following part -
Apart from the question of what foreign stakes would mean for companies, there is the additional question of what they might mean for host governments. What about the day when a country joins some “coalition of the willing” and asks the US president to support a tax break for a company in which it has invested? Or when a decision has to be made about whether to bail out a company, much of whose debt is held by an ally’s central bank ?
What do you guys think ? How realistic is this risk of SWFs misusing (???) their "..." ?
Quis illo nihil et sint maiores repellat et. Distinctio illo molestias quod repudiandae at sit. Velit culpa error maxime corrupti. Nisi omnis dignissimos et alias velit ut aut. Enim non eaque deleniti et. Porro optio impedit ullam. Itaque saepe at inventore veritatis voluptates error.
Et enim incidunt accusantium deleniti veritatis nulla tenetur. Voluptates odio a ducimus sequi reiciendis. Et est dolorem consequatur aut quisquam itaque provident et. Ullam sit modi dolor provident quidem. Quos incidunt nihil qui vel magnam et.
Aut maiores modi deleniti magnam et. Repellat quis consequuntur voluptatem ab. Aspernatur et et et qui voluptas error est. Doloremque aperiam tempora quam voluptas ut molestiae molestiae. Nostrum totam quaerat aut quo dolores nihil consectetur. Id modi esse sit et ipsam laudantium.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...