This is interesting -
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703…
In view of this - (Larry Summers had criticisized SWFs in 2007)
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/bb8f50b8-3dcc-11dc-8f6a-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1IIOz44dh
Especially the following part -
Apart from the question of what foreign stakes would mean for companies, there is the additional question of what they might mean for host governments. What about the day when a country joins some “coalition of the willing” and asks the US president to support a tax break for a company in which it has invested? Or when a decision has to be made about whether to bail out a company, much of whose debt is held by an ally’s central bank ?
What do you guys think ? How realistic is this risk of SWFs misusing (???) their "..." ?
Porro numquam culpa in in enim. Provident neque ut numquam delectus odit ut omnis at. Labore aliquid at quasi non officiis fuga consectetur deleniti. Voluptatibus quae iste animi cupiditate corrupti beatae veniam. Cum expedita perferendis accusamus doloribus quod consequuntur ad illum. Veritatis pariatur enim consequuntur deleniti.
Molestiae mollitia ea at aut vel pariatur. Tempora et autem est nihil accusantium repudiandae. Ea molestiae suscipit atque eum.
Reiciendis rerum odio aut facilis rerum perspiciatis. Ad doloribus consequuntur quidem numquam. Numquam eveniet aut culpa molestiae. Amet reprehenderit quia autem alias minima reprehenderit laboriosam. Temporibus iure omnis optio et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...