Anyone got a boilerplate T/S for a loan sale?
We're buying an NPL but just wanna make sure our stuff is tight.
Trending Content
| +73 | Hiring Analyst/Associate - Advice | 35 | 10h | |
| +43 | Laid Off - Multifamily Acquisitions Help | 13 | 5s | |
| +40 | Is construction profitable? How do you raise capital? | 10 | 1h | |
| How many days a week are you expected to be in the office? | 24 | 9h | ||
| +23 | Multifamily Creative UW Assumptions | 7 | 10m | |
| +23 | NYU MSRE Program | 7 | 5d | |
| +19 | Are Additional Capital Calls Usually Mandatory in REPE? | 8 | 1d | |
| +18 | M&A background to CRE Advice | 3 | 2d | |
| +15 | How is this not illegal? | 3 | 3d | |
| +15 | OM - Data Room Advice | 13 | 5d |
Career Resources
There are way too many factors that determine what would be a standard NPL sale contract, starting with basics like type of NPL you're buying and in which jurisdiction. You'd be a fool to take any recommendation here (or anyone else other than a proper legal advisor).
Also, I fear that if you don't know if your shit "is tight" in a term sheet, you're about to get rammed in the SPA.
Is the note being sold as is? Do you know if the seller has all the documentation to transfer the paper such as an Allonge, recorded mortgage/AORs, UCCs? Will the seller send out the goodbye/hello letters or your firm? Will seller draft all assignment docs or your firm? What is the cutoff date on the loan? Are you buying just the UPB or UPB plus fees/accrued interest?
Can you give more specifics? I'd be interested in a case study, especially for the current environment.
I would throw out a term sheet that at least contains the following:
guaranty of lien position, with some sort of recourse
your watch / our watch language (I.e. whatever they did when owning was compliant with the unbelievable amount of legislation)
rep the terms (balance, any mods, rate, maturity etc).
That will give you enough to bid, however, you will need legal counsel to draft a Loan Sale Agreement after your terms are accepted and you’re in closing.
As a lender, I would never sell a loan with recourse. You can do your DD and see I have a title search and policy, which will be assigned to you, but I'm never going to grant a buyer of an NPL recourse.
Happens all the time - recourse is probably the wrong word, but adding it to the reps.
Here is some language from a broker on an NPL pool I received this morning:
The seller will Rep these are first mortgages and will be able to give a SOL rep on these 65 loans.
Sed minima sit eaque omnis totam. Enim molestiae nobis vel numquam. Repellendus quas repellat est odio.
In molestiae omnis ut. Omnis iusto est quasi omnis ratione. Qui deleniti illo fugit voluptatibus dolor quod.
Maxime amet officiis dolore repellendus et. Accusamus non nihil fugit laborum. Temporibus ipsum eum culpa totam. Eos saepe suscipit amet. Autem sapiente qui excepturi nihil sunt et. Necessitatibus corporis quia iste.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...