Hello all,
I have a quick question on a test that I am struggling with and I cant find much information online about it, so this seemed to be the best place to get it answered. If I have an investor that is targeting a nominal rate of return of 20%, how do I adjust that to the effective IRR they are targeting?
| +52 | Leave brokerage to be GP | 12 | 2d | |
| +49 | New Comp Database - Google Form (Now with Data Validation) | 24 | 2d | |
| +24 | Seeking Career Guidance in Real Estate Development Post-Graduation | 3 | 3d | |
| +23 | Spreads over SOFR/UST | 7 | 1m | |
| +23 | Going out on your own | 4 | 2d | |
| +22 | REPE/Development GPA | 15 | 5d | |
| +21 | Real Estate = complicated + underpaid | 15 | 2d | |
| +20 | High achiever that doesn’t want to work weekends | 12 | 7h | |
| +17 | Fisher Brothers | 6 | 2d | |
| +17 | MSRE/MSRED with no RE experience; Naive to think I’ll land a job afterwards? | 4 | 6d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Ah, the age-old question of nominal rate of return versus effective IRR – a classic conundrum in the finance jungle! Let's swing through the basics to get you to the other side.
First off, the nominal rate of return is like the face value of a banana – it's what you see at first glance. It's the stated rate without taking inflation or the frequency of compounding into account. Now, when you peel that banana and take a bite, you're getting into the effective IRR territory. The effective IRR (Internal Rate of Return) considers the compounding effect within a specific period, giving you a more accurate picture of what you're really earning or, in finance terms, the real rate of return.
To adjust a nominal rate of return to the effective IRR, you need to consider the compounding effect. Here's a simple formula to transform your nominal rate into an effective rate:
[ \text{Effective IRR} = \left(1 + \frac{\text{Nominal Rate}}{n}\right)^n - 1 ]
Where: - The Nominal Rate is your targeted 20% (or 0.20 when expressed as a decimal). - (n) is the number of compounding periods per year.
If your investor's target is compounded annually, then (n = 1), and the nominal rate equals the effective rate, which means no adjustment is needed. However, if the compounding is more frequent (semi-annually, quarterly, monthly, etc.), you'll need to adjust accordingly.
For example, if the compounding is semi-annually ((n = 2)), the formula would look like this:
[ \text{Effective IRR} = \left(1 + \frac{0.20}{2}\right)^2 - 1 = \left(1 + 0.10\right)^2 - 1 = 1.21 - 1 = 0.21 ]
So, the effective IRR would be 21%.
Remember, the jungle of finance is dense with details like these. Understanding the nuances between nominal and effective rates is crucial for navigating it successfully. Keep swinging through those financial vines, and you'll master the terrain in no time!
Sources: Relationship among Cap Rate, IRR, Discount rate and NPV, Trying to understand the concept of IRR, Diminutive Nature of Net Returns
Thought is that nominal return is total return over period of time. For example 20% nominal return = 1.2x multiple. Solve for IRR in order to achieve 20% nominal return ( 1 + nominal return / 1 ) ^ ( 1 / time period ) - 1
In this example using a 5 year time horizon you would solve for ~3.71% IRR
Yes, this is a good explanation, but usually, nominal is used for annual return regardless of compounded return. So you would still need to target that 20% IRR return for the whole period, and just assume all cash flows at the end of the year and not when realized. Almost like IRR vs XIRR.
Example: If you invested -100 today and are targeting a 20% nominal return, then you need to return 20/year + 100 at the exit year. Regardless of actual months, those returns were received.
Would clarify with the prompt though, it could be what the previous poster was saying, just seems odd to specify a 20% return without timing constraints unless it's assumed a 20% annual return.
I really appreciate the replies both of you. However, is it possible to interpret it this way, and treat it like a nominal interest rate vs an effective interest rate? So, in my questions scenario it would be calculated as: effective IRR = (1+(nom/ time period))^(time period)-1?
So basically, you could enter in a certain year period given the nominal rate of return, and it would give you the effective IRR (which would be higher than the nominal). This question seems to be worded poorly so I am very confused to be honest.
Qui fuga doloremque voluptas nulla. Vel consectetur similique inventore magnam cum. Sed dolores vel eaque quam debitis ipsum. Assumenda aut enim libero sint animi expedita.
Nulla quasi qui et ut in. Ipsam dolor exercitationem perspiciatis saepe. Soluta voluptatem dolores nulla inventore aut est dolorem laudantium.
Incidunt maiores quo temporibus. Aperiam itaque molestias veniam earum ut veritatis et. Alias ut provident quisquam explicabo qui maiores. Aut et aut libero accusantium vel.
Eius nihil officiis sunt. Quis exercitationem voluptatum atque earum molestiae facere eligendi. Nesciunt totam cum aliquid ut. Pariatur sit illum esse labore excepturi non. Aut id vel qui occaecati aliquam est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...