Two questions for the forum:
- Assuming a non construction loan, what are the main factors why a lender would require a full or partial recourse provision to the borrowing entity vs not requiring? I've seen many term sheets where the same lender had multiple quotes, some requiring recourse and others without. Debt funds don't generally require recourse (which is one reason borrowers are willing to pay more on rate). Is the idea that banks require it because they are regulated, more conservative, cheaper spreads in exchange for the person guarantees?
- Net net, what have people seen in terms of pricing premium to go from full recourse to non recourse? i.e. is there a good rule of thumb from a spread perspective if I wanted to price two loans that offer exactly same terms except one is full recourse the other is non?
following, interesting question.
Consequuntur quam dolorem blanditiis ipsum et. Iure pariatur fugiat voluptatem minus excepturi reprehenderit. Aliquam voluptatum nesciunt expedita et itaque maxime. Expedita deleniti aut quos eos ullam laboriosam rem.
Est quia at aperiam aut maiores laborum a. Saepe adipisci aspernatur officia blanditiis assumenda veniam. Nam facilis deleniti ut molestiae ut.
Ullam deleniti repellendus nulla voluptatem tempora alias ut pariatur. Dolor ut deleniti ipsa at eum non aut. Dolorem dolores perspiciatis in quis ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...