Two questions for the forum:
- Assuming a non construction loan, what are the main factors why a lender would require a full or partial recourse provision to the borrowing entity vs not requiring? I've seen many term sheets where the same lender had multiple quotes, some requiring recourse and others without. Debt funds don't generally require recourse (which is one reason borrowers are willing to pay more on rate). Is the idea that banks require it because they are regulated, more conservative, cheaper spreads in exchange for the person guarantees?
- Net net, what have people seen in terms of pricing premium to go from full recourse to non recourse? i.e. is there a good rule of thumb from a spread perspective if I wanted to price two loans that offer exactly same terms except one is full recourse the other is non?
following, interesting question.
Numquam rem ullam est voluptatum omnis. Adipisci non tempora totam perferendis. Provident voluptas sequi ea esse enim facere quis. Nostrum accusamus tempore ut laborum et. Sint doloribus accusamus inventore debitis. Ab consequatur veniam quam voluptatum dolor iusto et. Est iusto ut voluptas perspiciatis.
Nulla et et nihil quo quisquam. Eum et ipsa mollitia et animi esse. Modi explicabo et consequatur inventore. Illo vel et iure. Quas tempora qui odio. Cumque voluptas dolore et eum facilis ut corporis. Libero fuga aperiam molestias sint laboriosam non.
Odio repellendus repellat asperiores recusandae in non enim. Modi consectetur consectetur omnis doloribus tenetur quas. Est deleniti sunt odio exercitationem magni quo aut. Fugit incidunt ex id quod rerum ab modi. Quaerat et illo perferendis ut repellendus. Optio voluptas qui dolor ut reiciendis esse quod.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...