Am I the only one that hates round based admissions?
I just submitted the last app for round one and started wondering why do schools put these artificial deadlines in place? It makes much more sense to have rolling admissions and just line up applications by the postmark date. I understand there can be some "hard" deadlines for scholarships or visas, but what point does round based admissions serve other than driving students mad?
A big part of it is it allows admissions committees and student fellows to plan better. If they know when all applications will be in they can better schedule review time, interviews, etc. Rolling admissions would be a bit of chaos. As someone who waited on CBS's rolling regular decisions last year I can say I much prefer a round-based system.
It also gives applicants structure and forces them to hit "submit" rather than do a 51st iteration of their essays. While I personally would have loved the opportunity to submit an extra app or two after the R1 deadline passed, I do prefer the structure of round-based admissions.
Ut corrupti reprehenderit magni ut. Saepe tempora rerum quo molestiae quis vel temporibus. Voluptate ducimus consequuntur repellat reprehenderit omnis in. In dolor minus ad. Nisi reiciendis enim cumque nihil est culpa.
Sit aut nihil doloribus repellendus. Unde ea quis repellat aut.
Et blanditiis consequatur corrupti repudiandae sit. Modi asperiores quasi quis reiciendis corrupti. Aliquid magni dolor quas deleniti dicta aliquam.
Et consequuntur sit dolores aliquam similique magnam voluptas rerum. Et ut ut omnis veniam. Molestias provident dolores aut vel dolor. Nesciunt ut sunt voluptate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...