http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/01/business/01goldman.html?_r=1
He just went back to K&E. No biggie.
It may be a reflection on Goldman's ability to earn in the future.
Might it?
Yes, I see what you are saying. The article has an encripted message that Goldman will lay off another 327,482 employees, because their revenues are going to fall by 110%.
He just went back to K&E.
He just went back to K&E. No biggie.
hard to say
He just went back to K&E. No biggie.
It may be a reflection on Goldman's ability to earn in the future.
Really hard to say
He just went back to K&E. No biggie.
It may be a reflection on Goldman's ability to earn in the future.
Might it?
Who cares?
He just went back to K&E. No biggie.
It may be a reflection on Goldman's ability to earn in the future.
Yes, I see what you are saying. The article has an encripted message that Goldman will lay off another 327,482 employees, because their revenues are going to fall by 110%.